Typophile

Mad Typography

jkstrong

When advertisers began needing speedy overturns of diverse fonts, designers had to come up with a quick solution. They would use old letterforms and amplify their appearance to make them look new. This solved the problem of getting the typefaces to the advertisers, but it did not result in creating well-made type. Most of the typefaces that were created were bastardized faces that eschewed classical typographical standards. Type must be legible and not simply used as background or gray matter, but as an instrument for conveying clear meaning.

Three considerations have governed type design since the industry's beginning. Utility (how a face functions) and aesthetics, (how it looks on a printed page) both govern qualities of readability and legibility, while style affects what cultural code a typeface evokes. In the end, type is meant to attract and please.


Nothing against Madigans, but any sign that cannot easily be read, fails in its overall purpose. Type is meant to be legible and accurately display the style and feel of the time and place, this sign does neither.

The slanted and squished lettering makes the sign both illegible and unclear. If you can't read the sign, then there's no way of knowing what buisness is being advertised. The kerning is uneven and unpleasant to look at, and the only clearly decipherable letter is the "g" in the very middle of the word. This sign's lettering is uneasy on the eyes, forcing them to squint in and out of focus to try and make out what is written.

Perhaps they should have tried to be less sleek looking and stuck with a more classic, unbasterized typeface.

Is it a reataurant/bar?

One theory. The neon is not on so they must be closed. I bet when the neon is on there is a world of difference in readability/legibility. The painted letters are only a backdrop, or foil, for the neon. Go back when it is on and see if it is better.

Michael

Michael, judging from another thread* it seems you're miffed at being seemingly ignored here. But you shouldn't be so hasty (it's only been about three weeks, and you've seen how long threads can survive on Typophile**) and certainly not so easily offended. I was in your position recently (actually much worse, since I had spent a fair amount of time thinking, scanning and writing) and lost my cool ever so slightly after two weeks, but managed to resume help two months after that, and eventually got an overly gracious response: http://typophile.com/node/51729

* http://typophile.com/node/55930

** http://typophile.com/node/2166

Ergo: you can't force people to respect you.
You just have to provide help for its own sake.

hhp

Not trying to force respect or worried about being ignored.

I just checked back on this site because I knew the environment.
Michael

And I should have known you would have gone here to try and distort what I was trying to get across.

You try to pervert everything. You are truly sociopathic.

Michael

Just trying to give you advice, based on 11+ years of immersion
in typographic fora. And yes, I know you don't want my advice.
But demand is not what motivates me - it's necessity.

hhp

Then why so contentious and nasty?

Michael

You and I have been here before to no avail. You attack me and it pisses me off. You are no better than I or anybody else on this site, so why the pomposity?

Let us do this in front of everybody, and deal with it!

Basically we are on a back channel (in this node) so have at it, or e-mail me. You have my e-mail address. I reached out to you before.

It is counter productive to keep this active.

Michael

I disagree.

hhp

Dear Michael,
I am sorry if my response time was not prompt enough for you, I appreciated your comment and, yes it is better at night. I do not however appreciate the name calling and negative comments about my blog. Our beautiful and brilliant professors here at Loyola merely wanted to expose us to another aspect of design media by having us post our extra assignments on here. I did not mean to offend you by posting and running, but this blog is just one part of the many time consuming projects that we as students must devote our time to. I hope that you can respect what we are posting in the future, and if you wish to comment please keep it constructive. No one benefits from childish insults or negative input.
Thank you,
Jessica

AMEN, JESSICA! WELL SAID!

Agreed!

No matter how beautiful or intelligent your professor may be, they're lacking a basic understanding of online communities and basic netiquette.

No one is disrespecting you, we're just a little frustrated with you professor's assignment.

We know you are students and this is merely one of the many tasks you've been assigned to do. That's the annoying aspect. Not your fault.

As for hrant and typerror bickering, hey, it's a blog on the internet. It comes with the territory. ;o)

Captured from web.archive.org on 28 Jun 2013. view this capture