I’ll let you know how my offspring, who never turn off lights when they leave a room, and should appreciate a vulgar visual typographic pun, respond, but I don’t anticipate any change in their behaviour. Too ingrained.
Awareness campaigns are not the way to combat global warming.
Neither are percentage reduction targets for industry — because we live on a finite planet, we need absolute targets.
Banning incandescent bulbs is a token gesture.
Gasoline and air miles should be rationed.
Speaking of things it reminds people of. This reminds when I was working on the east coast and the wife of one of our designers worked for the competition across the street. They did a summer morale BBQ and gave people shirts with the slogan “Good is the opposite of great”. We all begged for a copy of the shirt, sadly she had given hers away before the end of the day, before we found out about it.
Seems like the campaign is working well for them - its stirring up a big brewhaha and attracting great coverage towards the client; this is the third time it has been brought to my attention. The PR guys and gals for the client must be licking there lips over this.
Whether the ad campaign is ethical and has worked for the client ’for the right’ reasons is another question?
Captured from web.archive.org on 11 Sep 2007. view this capture