Try spotting the differences between the 2 jpgs.

>But so far, no sponsor to transform my 6 TTFonts into a single OTF?!

For sure the work in converting your custom-encoded fonts into an OpenType font isn't trivial, but why do you need a sponsor? What's holding you back from doing this yourself?

Arabic is a glorious script (one of my all-time favorites),
and you've put in an incredible amount of effort. Bravo.

The main thing I notice about this is its extreme tightness.
This is not unique, but especially in the digital realm it
is pretty rare. It saves space, and creates a special texture,
but as you might have already encountered, some people
will say it's too tight.

Speaking of saving space, you write:
> need no space between the words

Although this is more true for Arabic than Latin (except for fully-joined Latin script fonts :-) it's still not true enough: if the last letter of a word happens to be one that has no join on its left, it can often get confusing. On the other hand, Arabic does save space in two other ways: it can dump [short] vowels*; and it distributes its "information" more evenly in the Cartesian area** (which also has a readability advantage). But this latter part comes at a price: lesser apparent size.

* Although this actually comes from a linguistic advantage:
Semitic languages need vowels far less than Indo-European ones.

** Whereas Latin for one is much more horizontal.

In terms of getting this to market, I might suggest Linotype.
But if they say no, they probably have a valid reason: they
already have an accomplished "uncompromising" Arabic
typeface, including full coverage of the Qur'aan style.
If they decline you could look for font houses that would
like to rival Linotype in Arabic fonts.

Or you could try contacting SIL. They recently
released Arabic fonts, but nothing like yours.
http://www.sil.org/ _
Just one thing: with SIL, don't push the Qur'aan angle too much.

Lastly, like Simon said you could do it all on your own.
But finding and leveraging good distribution channels
for this sort of thing is non-trivial.

hhp

Misunderstood and Underestimated Space-savingness!
What makes Arabic space-saving is Not Only the Word-Spacings But Also Ligatures and Kerning (inter-word-spacing).
Ligatures integrate 2 or more letters into one. Example: L+M+H+M occupy a single Ha-space.
Kerning integrates 2 letters into One. Example: Alif+R occupy a single R-space.
Ligatures and Kerning are fantastically handled in my font.

Vowels too play their role in Arabic Space-savingness. How?
Arabic Vowels are virtually dropped without sacrificing readability thus made less horizontal than the Vowels-thirsty English.

Word Space Modulation (WSM)
If a word ending with a clockwise letter (like Ra) is followed by a word starting with counterclockwise letter (like 3ain), the space between them is eleminated without sacrificing readability. My word Macros fail to do this WSM in the case of a fully justified text.

What’s holding me back me from transforming my the Six (6) TTFonts into a single OTF?!
Unfortunately, LinoType rejected my font without giving any reason save-I guess- the complexity of transforming the 6 TTFs fonts into a single OpenType Font though they have never produced any “uncompromising” font with nor without the Quran style.
Lack of Capital, Lack of indepth Knowledge of Open-Type Tech and more discouraging is the Web that has rendered Copyrights meaningless particularly in the Arabic World. Here and around you can get All the Linotype and SIL fonts free of charge.
Otherwise, by now, I have marketed them without transforming them into a single font?

> My word Macros fail to do this WSM in the case of a fully justified text.

Which is a shame, since deploying "vertical kerning" so to speak
seems like a pretty clever way to justify a line. On the other hand,
Arabic has the advantage of the wonderful kasheedah for doing the
same (although admitedly by taking up MORE space instead of less).

> they have never produced any “uncompromising”
> font with nor without the Quran style.

I thought Linotype sells the fancy Diwan font that handles
Qur'aan setting (the impressive demo of which I saw at the
ATypI conference in Leipzig in 2000).

> you can get All the Linotype and SIL fonts free of charge.

The SIL fonts are actually free anyway (which doesn't
mean however that SIL doesn't pay people to make them).

> Otherwise, by now, I have marketed them
> without transforming them into a single font?

I'm assuming that's not really a question,
and you're saying that you would have started
selling the "complex" system on your own were it
not for piracy. Ironically though, I would think
that this complexity would discourage piracy! :-)
But by the same token, it would discourage sales
as well I guess...

Maybe, if this is valuable enough to some people,
you could price it very high, include training with
the fonts, and settle for selling only a handful.

hhp

Kasheedah is wonderful if deployed where needed. But It behaves randomly and indiscriminately beautifying some words and spoiling others. So, it is virtually useless. WSM is a wiser alternative. But...

Diwan Mishafi font is a built-in font and applicable in Diwan Sofwares only. Still it is not a faithful production (match) to their own Caligrapher's handwriting.

Complex system?!
Making the fonts and building the macros was as complex as building my Flowers
But deploying the font and applying the Macros is as easy as solving them.
However, I am Still fighting the web to find One of the handful you mentioned in your marketing proposal.
Many Thanks

>Unfortunately, LinoType rejected my font without giving any reason save-I guess- the...

I can understand given the level of piracy out there that you might not want to go it alone, but Linotype isn't the only vendor working on Arabic types, Bitstream recently announced a tie-up with Mamoun Sakkal, and Monotype is involved in this area too. I'm sure there are others out there. For sure they may decide not to collaborate with you, but they'll likely give you an explanation if you ask nicely.

Cheers, Si

this may be a little bit offtopic, but:

hrant said:
«Semitic languages need vowels far less than Indo-European ones.»

as far as i know, egyptian language (2000BC or so) used no vowels at all in written language - but i dont know how it was in spoken language.

that fact leads to the problem that some names could be pronounced differently - lets say "Ramses" could also be "Rumsos". but most of the names are probably covered because there are transcripts of them in other languages (à la stone of rosetta).

and yes, i know that semitic would mean "on the arabic peninsula" if you'd be precise, but i just wanted to add this fact, nothing more.

If your font is as good as you say it is, there should be enough of a market for it in the West (in fact, all around the world) to justify developing and publishing it yourself.

While going through that process might not at first be a good return on your investment of time, other things will grow out of it.

What you will need is your own website to publicize and explain the font, with a link to myfonts.com, where customers will be able to license and download it. That's the basic set-up for "indie" fonts, used by hundreds of foundries.

While Myfonts distributes all-comers, other distributors are selective, to varying degrees, in the number of foundries they represent. But those other distributors will be more inclined to distribute your font(s) once you have established a basic presence.

And really, there's not much difference between a contract with a distributor, and one with a publisher ("foundry").

> If your font is as good as you say it is, there should be enough of a market

Not really. Simply because high culture is not very marketable (like you should be realizing with Panoptica). Certainly, "good" doesn't equate to "trendy". In fact sometimes, Really Good stuff simply has to be given away. And other times it's sadly not a good fit to the devious and capricious retail market.

hhp

high culture is not very marketable (like you should be realizing with Panoptica)

Aziz (or should I be addressing you as Mostafa?) -- I have type designs released by four publishers (since 1984), and another 20-odd typefaces which I publish myself (since 1999), which are sold around the world by nine distributors. So my advice is based on practical experience.

While it's true that a typeface such as my Panoptica sells only a small amount, and never gets on the best-seller list at Myfonts, since its release in 2003 it's sold over a hundred (individual fonts) there, to people from many countries. That's the thing, although the retail market is, if not devious, at least capricious, thanks to the Internet it is a world market, and there are enough people committed to good typography, around the world, to make self-publishing a viable business.

> So my advice is based on practical experience.

But even more so on your belief system. Which to me is
like Swiss cheese: tasty, but more notable for its holes. :-)

Also: how many non-Latin fonts have you sold?
How many Arabic ones? Don't understimate
Aziz's complaint concerning piracy.

> it’s true that a typeface such as my Panoptica sells only a small amount

The last time you brought that up, you were baffled by the fact.
I'm simply trying to help you understand.

> ... to make self-publishing a viable business.

I certainly agree.
But it's mostly trendy faces that make the money. If you depended
only on fonts like Panoptica, would things still be "viable"? Sadly, no.

Anyway my main contention arose from your "enough of a market". Enough
for what? Probably a return on time invested. And in the case of something that
so few people (especially rich ones) appreciate, there's no way that's there.

hhp

Don’t understimate Aziz’s complaint concerning piracy.

I don't, which is why I emphasized the size and variety of the world market.

I’m simply trying to help you understand.

You're mocking me for poor sales, because you enjoy insulting me and my "belief system".

If you depended only on fonts like Panoptica, would things still be “viable”? Sadly, no.

I was refering to the viability of self-publishing, not related to any particular genre of typeface.

But it’s mostly trendy faces that make the money.

Right, popular faces sell more. Doh.

And in the case of something that so few people (especially rich ones) appreciate, there’s no way that’s there.

Well that's something for Aziz to figure out. All I'm doing is explaining a distribution model, and pointing out that obscure products can succeed, because the global market is so large and diverse.

> I emphasized the size and variety of the world market.

Here's the variety for you: in Western Europe and the
US* people buy fonts, in the rest of the world they don't. :-/

* I'm including Canada. ;-)

> You’re mocking me for poor sales

?
No way. Poor sales (and 100 units isn't bad) on one font can be
just a fluke - most of the remainder of your library sells much
better, right? At least you've said before that your overall
sales are great - and that's enviable, not laughable.

Nick, we're different. If trying to help somebody else
understand something is a foreign concept to you, don't
think that everybody on the planet is like that. Yes, I
can, and do help people I don't like - if maybe mostly
because that helps ME become better. How many
times have I propped up Panoptica, Richler and
even Iowan Oldstyle? Blame my mother I guess.

> Right, popular faces sell more. Doh.

But the association you're skirting is that TRENDY,
as in fashionable, hip, faces (of which Aziz's font is
NOT one) are the popular ones.

The consolation is that these fonts
also tend to be forgotten quickly.

> obscure products can succeed

Financially, as a rule, obscure fonts cannot.

Make an Arabic font, even a trendy one, and let's see if
you make one month's rent or mortgage on it in 10 years.

hhp

Here’s the variety for you: in Western Europe and the US* people buy fonts, in the rest of the world they don’t. :-/

Again, I'll pass on my experience -- Mostly in the US, but also this year I've sold fonts through Myfonts to people in Canada, Japan, Austria, Singapore, Australia, NZ, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Finland, and Belgium. That's for fonts with Latin encoding. I leave it to Aziz to figure out where the Arab communities and Arab printers/publishers are.

How many times have I propped up Panoptica, Richler and even Iowan Oldstyle?

Is that like investing in insult credits?

Make an Arabic font, even a trendy one, and let’s see if you make one month’s rent or mortgage on it in 10 years.

I don't know anything about Arabic fonts, or the market for them. But if there is any market at all (rather than relying on the reputation of Linotype), then the method I have outlined -- self-publishing and Internet sales -- may be one way to access it. I tend to *believe* in the unexpected, so why not try and make it happen?

Here’s the variety for you: in Western Europe and the US* people buy fonts, in the rest of the world they don’t. :-/

Again, I'll pass on my experience -- Mostly in the US, but also this year I've sold fonts through Myfonts to people in Canada, Japan, Austria, Singapore, Australia, NZ, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Finland, and Belgium. That's for fonts with Latin encoding. I leave it to Aziz to figure out where the Arab communities and Arab printers/publishers are.

How many times have I propped up Panoptica, Richler and even Iowan Oldstyle?

Is that like investing in insult credits?

Make an Arabic font, even a trendy one, and let’s see if you make one month’s rent or mortgage on it in 10 years.

I don't know anything about Arabic fonts, or the market for them. But if there is any market at all (rather than relying on the reputation of Linotype), then the method I have outlined -- self-publishing and Internet sales -- may be one way to access it. I tend to *believe* in the unexpected, so why not try and make it happen?

> Canada, Japan, Austria, Singapore, Australia,
> NZ, Switzerland, Puerto Rico, Finland, and Belgium

All affluent countries. There's a reason Malaysia, Jordan
and Ecuador are absent, and it's not because they don't
use Latin fonts - they certainly do.

BTW, if you'd like an actual list, look at the middle of this page:
http://www.atypi.org/20_join_atypi/50_individual _
In fact why do you think ATypI makes such an exception?
Know that it didn't come easy - there was resistance at
the highest levels. But in the end it was so clearly just
that plain common sense prevailed.

See what proportion of fonts you sell to THAT collection of
countries (which coincidentally form the crushing majority
of this planet's population). I'm sorry, but no amount of
melifluous serenades about "the unexpected" is going to
change that reality.

> Is that like investing in insult credits?

Perhaps in a blindered, one-dimensional, one-upmanship world.
In my world, the compliments and "insults" (your term) come from
the same place: plain old honesty. If that fact seems... otherworldly,
then I'm sorry to see such an attitude.

hhp

I’m sorry, but no amount of melifluous serenades about “the unexpected” is going to change that reality.

I wasn't addressing the rich country/poor country situation. I was correcting your assertion that only North America and Europe buy fonts.

plain old honesty.

How about plain old respect for other people?

First, please feel free to call me Aziz,
Then, tell me frankly:
If you can get a free-copy of a cheap software—let alone the expensive one—,
will you pay for it to the Author?
All the best.

To go back abit:

Aziz Mustafa wrote:

>>Uncompromising Arabic Font

A better approach to Arabic fonts and Arabic typography is to ensure wide open options availability. We must ensure that users have options. Saying this I must congratulate Aziz on his great hard work. But “uncompromising Arabic fonts” is not the correct phrase. Perhaps "Uncompromising Calligraphic or traditional Quraanic Arabic font" would be better. Aziz fonts are uncompromising in their quality as related to a certain Arabic Quraanic calligraphic style but they not uncompromising fonts as Arabic fonts. Indeed they compromise technology and its economic factor, literacy, education, and global competition.
Traditional Arabic poetry is beautiful, but “free” Arabic poetry can be as beautiful. Both are Arabic poetry. Same goes for Arabic typography, we need to open options to the users. Arabic typography should not be defined rigidly.

>>As the strength of a chain lies in its weakest link, the Quality of an Arabic font lies in its poorest feature: Ligatures , Diacritics Positioning and Kerning?

Ligatures, are both strength and weakness. Strength calligraphically but weakness typographically. Technology almost passed Arabic by because of insistence on institutionalizing complexity as the norm. Arabic should not be hostage of technology, it should instead emphasize simplification to conquer technology. In fact Arabic history adapted to new factors.

>>need no space between the words: one would simply understand where a word ends and the next one starts.

Even the greatest quraanic and calligraphic Arabic test can significantly benefits from spaces. There is a need for space.

Nick Shinn wrote:

> If your font is as good as you say it is, there should be enough of a market

Hrant wrote:

>>Not really. Simply because high culture is not very marketable (like you should be realizing with Panoptica). Certainly, “good” doesn’t equate to “trendy”. In fact sometimes, Really Good stuff simply has to be given away. And other times it’s sadly not a good fit to the devious and capricious retail market.

Dear hrant. I am confused. In another Forum and discussion, you attacked Mr. Thomas Milo, a pioneer Arabic caligraphic typfaces designer for decades dismissing even the need for Quraanic and calligraphic Arabic fonts. Why Aziz’s fonts are different now?

-Saad

> Ligatures ... weakness typographically.

That's a Modernist fallacy.
Some very recent related material: http://typophile.com/node/19376

> Arabic should not be hostage of technology

And neither should readers.

BTW, a hostage can't exactly liberate himself by becoming servile!

> dismissing even the need for Quraanic and calligraphic Arabic fonts.

1) Look through my previous posts in this thread, and try to find any place where I say that I actually like Aziz's font... A good critic helps a person get to where that person wants; he does not dismiss, he does not coerce; but he does educate and warn along the way. Taming one's own ideals is the key to becoming a good critic, for the simple reason that personal context is everything, and nobody is infallible or omniscient. Basically, it's an act of sharing, not shepherding.

2) The argument with Thomas was messy and emotional (especially when he lapsed into historical revisionism on occasion - as you yourself complained back then) but as far as I remember my point wasn't to dismiss anything, but to ask that people not engage in historicism for its own sake, ignoring the current sociopolitical needs of users, and also that whatever path they choose, they realize and admit its full effects. To me Thomas's "problem" is that his work in effect (if not really necessarily) engrains chirography to the depths of the bones of visible language, where I feel that even its presence in the outer skin is a problem! This, whether anybody realizes it, admits it, or not.

To his great credit however, if you remember, Thomas had the grace and humility to admit that perhaps chirography is not as good a foundation for his scheme as would be readability. I wish that other people -including myself- could be that way more often.

————

Today, learn about the Armenian Genocide:
http://www.armenian-genocide.org/genocidefaq.html

hhp

Just few points for Saada!
1. Spaces should be exploited not sacrificed.
2. What is wrong with my font? It does:
> go well with the Old and New Technology (Window 3.11 and WindowsXP).
> fulfill the requirements of Arabic Calligraphy and Typography,
> cover Arabic as well as Quranic Marks,
> work well on most Adobe, Microsoft Applications and Qurakexpress. Moreover
> look easy-on-the-eye, and will prove how easy-to-use.
What else?
Or should I dance to the tunes of the English-like Arabic Fonts Designers?!
Thanks with Flowers

> should I dance to the tunes of the English-like Arabic Fonts Designers?!

No, please not that! :-)
http://www.themicrofoundry.com/ss_rome3.html

But is there not a third way? Not that it's easy
to figure out; even a know-it-all smart-aleck
like me is totally stumped on this! :-)

But let's wait to see the Dubai results...

hhp

Hrant Wrote:
> Arabic should not be hostage of technology
>> And neither should readers. BTW, a hostage can’t exactly liberate himself by becoming servile!

If Arabic is hostage of technology then *users” of Arabic technology become the same. I do not see your statement in disagreement of mine. To clarify mine further, when Arabic or any other script editing and production on computers requires costly and technically sophisticated technologies we risk loosing users, markets, global competitions, and a lot of unnecessary expenses. Complex Chinese jumped to the web before Arabic! Arab petro-dollars spent billions to ensure that letters like “Dal” must have an isolated, initial, medial, and more glyphs. Why?

> dismissing even the need for Quraanic and calligraphic Arabic fonts.
>>1) Look through my previous posts in this thread, and try to find any place where I say that I actually like Aziz’s font…

Dear Hrant, funny you mention that. Yes I did notice that you did not say that you like Aziz fonts. On the other hand I loved them. My Question was why did you attack Thomas work and passion for calligraphic and Quraanic typography but had nice words for Aziz’s similar work. This was my confusion. In that debate you even denied that Arab users need Thomas calligraphic fonts.

Aziz wrote:
>2. What is wrong with my font?

Absolutely nothing wrong. Despite my non calligraphic font designs, I love Arabic calligraphy and support strongly Thomas’s or your works. Arabic fonts must include both. Non should imply or hint that Arabic fonts must follow a set of rules, or they must follow calligraphic rules. Your “uncompromising Arabic fonts” title tells the reader that other non calligraphic fonts are “compromising Arabic fonts” which brought up my disagreement.

>Or should I dance to the tunes of the English-like Arabic Fonts Designers?!

Dance as you like and wish as long as you do not trip and do not push or hurt other dancers in the floor. Dance is healthy for us all
As for “English-like”, that is your opinion. Even if it is true I do not see why “English-like” or even “Chinese-like” is a problem here. Arabic is a great script that had adapted survived because of its great adaptability qualities. Remember font design is about options. Users options.

> I do not see your statement in disagreement of mine.

What I meant (and one place I thought we were disagreeing) is that
it doesn't make sense to for example disjoin Arabic simply because
Western technology (not to mention business) would like us to.

> why did you attack Thomas work and passion for calligraphic and
> Quraanic typography but had nice words for Aziz’s similar work.

Well, I can think of a few reasons, one being that I was/am not being even-handed enough. But other reasons are: like I said, Thomas is engraining chirography much more deeply; and Aziz and Thomas have different contexts, and are asking for different things (or not asking for anything*); Aziz for example seemed confident (too confident?) in the integrity of his design, and was actually mainly asking for marketing advice. I guess I was trying to encourage a relative unkown simply by saying that the effort is appreciated; passion is the key, and it can drive future development, often in better directions; like how I used to make cruddy Armenian fonts (I mean really cruddy - not like Aziz's work at all) and people encouraged me, so I kept at it, and now make totally different, and I think much more mature, Armenian fonts.

* An "arty" attitude which is itself objectionable.

> In that debate you even denied that Arab users need Thomas calligraphic fonts.

I try to never be that absolute (I think even
Helvetica has its uses :-) so I don't think I
said such a thing. But if I did, I was wrong.

> Dance as you like and wish as long as

But also, do not dance alone, in a private expressive vacuum.
That's not Design; and it's very selfish.

hhp

Hrant Wrote:

>>it doesn’t make sense to for example disjoin Arabic simply because
Western technology (not to mention business) would like us to.

Font design should be open. Users options should be open. What makes sense to some makes no sense to others. Technology and business are technology and Business. There are no "western technology" or "western Business". Just as Algebra and Chemistry are sciences not "Arabic Sciences" because they were historically developed by the Arab Muslim civilization.

>>I guess I was trying to encourage a relative unkown simply by saying that the effort is appreciated; passion is the key, and it can drive future development, often in better directions;

I have no doubt of your passionate and good natured manner, Hrant. That is why I was a bit surprised at your severity at that debate. Like you, my first comment to Aziz was "congratulations" too.

>>But also, do not dance alone, in a private expressive vacuum.

You can do that too. It is healthy.

-Saad

Saad, are you sure you're from Iraq?
Because your outlook seems way too rosy! :-)

> You can do that too. It is healthy.

Sure, but keep it private. Or if you feel the need to
show it, don't pretend it's anything more than Art.

hhp

Hrant wrote:

>>Saad, are you sure you’re from Iraq?
Because your outlook seems way too rosy! :-)

I do not see the font debate connection here. But still even in Iraq I am still an optimist: Bush's occupation has been a splendid failure thanks to the Iraqi heroic resistance! And as usual persistance works.

-Saad

Then, tell me frankly:
If you can get a free-copy of a cheap software—let alone the expensive one—,
will you pay for it to the Author?

Your question depends on whether the software is legally free, or "free" because it is pirated.
For my business, there are enough people, here and there, around the world, who are not software pirates, who buy my fonts.
I have described what works for me, with Latin-script fonts, some of which are trendy, some of which are experimental, and some of which are straightforward.
You will have to figure out how your situation compares with mine -- and decide if my business model can be used, or adapted, to work for you. Hopefully, I have given you some useful perspective. Good luck!

By English-like Arabic, I meant behavior, not shapes!
Arabic kids do not dance alone , in a private expressive vacuum.
Contrary to English, they twist and turn for Ligatures.

>>By English-like Arabic, I meant behavior, not shapes!
Arabic kids do not dance alone , in a private expressive vacuum.
Contrary to English, they twist and turn for Ligatures.

More of the same. Speaking and generalizing on behalf of users and the entire universe! Defining Arabic font taste, rules, history and future based on personal preferences!

Again the right approach for Arabic typography in my judgment is to ensure the availability of options through hard work.

-Saad

> here and there, around the world

More like here and here - only certain parts of the world. And critically in terms of your advice: generally not where Arabic is used. Don't get me wrong, it's very nice of you to offer advice, but be willing to modify it based on reality - based on the experience, as you say, of others.

> to ensure the availability of options through hard work.

And good ideas.
But Saad, still, some options are more relevant and
needed than others - saheeh amma la' ya khayyi? :-)

hhp

but be willing to modify it based on reality

For goodness sake Hrant get off my case and stop lecturing me.
I don't think Aziz is the idiot you seem to think he is, and is quite capable of understanding what I have to say, without your paraphrasing.

generally not where Arabic is used

http://www.girlguides.ca/default.asp?id=325

What "idiot", what "paraphrasing"? What you have told him is simply misleading, and I think you've actually come to realize that in fact. Except the simplest "I was sort of wrong" could never cross your lips I guess.

I'm not "on your case", I just find myself having to do
damage-control with you all the time - it's quite tedious!

hhp

what “paraphrasing”?

Nick: "here and there, around the world"
Hrant: "here and there - only certain parts of the world"

Ever the pedant (as Lorenza noted), you're splitting hairs.

Nick: "what works for me, with Latin-script fonts"
Hrant: "in terms of your advice: generally not where Arabic is used"

I think Aziz is aware that Arabic is not a Latin script, without your having to point it out.

What you have told him is simply misleading,

There is nothing deceptive about what I've said.
I have been very open in explaining how my business works, and I can assure you that none of what I said is false.

To Nick Shinn,
Am Confused. What is your site all about?
Fonty Girls and/or Girly Fonts?
Thanks with Flowers

Yes, the Girl Guides of Canada are good fonty girls, and they use good girly fonts (Fontesque, of course).

In reply to Saad,
> More of the same. Speaking and generalizing on behalf of users and the entire universe! Defining Arabic font taste, rules, history and future based on personal preferences!
Your words has reminded me with my over-intelligent blood-brother when he looked at the Map of the Earth one day and said:
If God is All-Knowing, then why does the earth look like this?

>Again the right approach for Arabic typography in my judgment is to ensure the availability of options through hard work.
What options?
_____________________
In reply to Nick,
Still Confused?
Where are your Girly Fonts?
What are you doing there: Mother of All Girls?
Or One of the Outstanding Fonty Girls?
Please put me in the right direction.

why does the earth look like this?

Yeah, Europe and Asia are too closely kerned :-)

Where are your Girly Fonts?

> Europe and Asia are too closely kerned

Lucky Europe. Hopefully this helps the West maintain a view into Reality.

BTW, to me calligraphic Arabic is as feminine as writing gets.

hhp

Though Europe and Asia are too closely kerned, still we very-3 seldom see a Japanese with sharp nose or a British with horizontal eyes!
One of God signs is the creation of the heavens and earth and the variety of our Tongues and Hues (Languages and Colors). Surely in that are signs to All of us.

Humans have very little variety of colour, compared to some other species. Birds, for instance. (It's more a question of tone.)
However, we have make-up and dyed hair, and genetic engineering will be able to create people with fluourescent green skin.
Speaking of tongues...
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/discoveries/2006-04-24-tongue-resea...

Poor Man, It took him centuries to discover himself.
And more time to Copy (not Create) Bodies (not Hearts)?!
_____________________________________
Just a fonty joke:
A gentleman met a lady at a coffee shop...
After a while, the lady followed the gentleman to his apartment.
Before Kerning and ligatures, the gentleman said: Frankly, My teeth are false!
The lady replied: Never mind! My hair and teeth are false!
Soon the gentleman apologized for a forgotten appointment and the 2 got away after Marks Positioning!
Happy Posting

Aziz wrote:

>>Your words has reminded me with my over-intelligent blood-brother when he looked at the Map of the Earth one day and said:
If God is All-Knowing, then why does the earth look like this?

>>What options?

if you are really looking for answers, may be you should ask your "over-intelligent blood-brother".

-Saad

To Saad,
Well, 1+1=2 and 1-1=0.
All the best.
_________________________
To Hrant H Papazian,
Miss you. Hope everything is OK with you.

Sorry Saad for my Slow Digestion
Now I come to understand what you meant by “pErS0na7 PrEfeREnCe5” and “@VAilabIlItY 0F oPtI0N5”.

Spicing "The Truth shall set you free" by Rodrigue Planck, I hope I have answered All the Friendly Marketing Proposals.
Enjoy reading:
http://typophile.com/node/19246

I’m not “on your case”, I just find myself having to do
damage-control with you all the time - it’s quite tedious!

No one asked you for damage control, American.

Lucky Europe. Hopefully this helps the West maintain a view into Reality.

Asia is reality? What's your point? You just say things to instigate, and you only do it because you have nothing useful to say.

the US* * I’m including Canada. ;-)
Is the smily because you're happy to be ignorant? Take a look at a map now and then.

I'm reminded nicely of one of the best lines in the already
generally superbly scripted "The Saint" (1997), when the
patazkukha says: "You are not people, you are Americans."

hhp

Peace be on All,
Please stop fighting and posting off-topic comments.
Enough GunSmoke?! Try the Power of Flowers