the faster one will win a chocolate
jp, or a curicana cake
On the other hand, now that you mention the "n"s, notice that the second "n" is malformed, while the first one (and every other glyph) is fine... So now I think maybe it is a font, and only that terminal "n" is a custom (and bad) mod job.
And I'm also getting a bell ringing: That "G" especially reminds me a lot of Michael Harvey's recent Tisdall font (of which I don't have a sample handy).
hhp
I'm interested to see the answer for this one, but I can see it isn't Michael Harvey's "Tisdall Script" (see http://www.identifont.com/show?BZ for a sample showing).
It doesn't look like anything in my Script Guide either, which is why I'd like to know what it is.
here's a secret link
www.13pt.com/projects/type/victoria.html
but...it's not the same
This looks to me like it actually might be a font, not
calligraphy. If it is handmade, then it was done digitally,
not as actual hand-done lettering. I say this based on
the consistency of the arches of u and y, the bowls of a
and d, and the two r's. The difference in color between
the two words is the result of enlarging a single master.
Captured from web.archive.org on 10 Oct 2013. view this capture