Anyone want to take a crack at this one?
Here is a version of Powell done by NovelFonts in 1994 called Powhatten. With added stroke thickness I thinks it's a very good match. Also, for comparison, Packard, which had some similar feeling. (Two of the 5 P's of Antique Type that always make me pause: Pabst, Packard, Parsons, Poor Richard and Powell.)
I agree, Pabst is not right. Neither is Poor Richard or Parsons. (Or, clearly, Packard)

That's the problem. I cannot find anywhere that still sells these fonts. As far as I know NovelFonts is defunct. I was able to find Powhatten on the web just now, but we do not like to point out sites with dubious wares for download.
If anyone knows of a source for NovelFonts, I would love to know about it, so I can tell others who ask about these fonts. I bought my set in 1994 from Tiger Direct as the "Expresiv Fonts Ornate Collection".
I agree with you about the loss of fonts, and thus I think it becomes a personal judgment about making a good faith effort to see if anyone still holds a copyright to the font before you decide that a design is 'dead' and in need of 'revival'. In this case NovelFonts was cautious enough to rename all of their fonts, although many, if not all, of them were old designs that were never digitized.
But I guess those statements were really about when you could revive a design. As far as 'sharing', I have always been VERY reluctant to do that, unless I believe the font is no longer commercially available, AND the individual I am 'sharing' it with is someone I know will not be using it commercially or selling/distributing it themselves. It's a slippery slope, so I would rather err on the side of conservativism, and avoid the practice altogether.
For a 'Revival' of 'Powell', you may want to take a look at 'Powell Antique', by Dieter Steffmann..
Captured from web.archive.org on 16 May 2005. view this capture