I have a bunch of alternative glyphs named incorrectly. For example, there is a "four_onum.alt".
-Is the correct way to name this four.onum.alt or maybe four.onum_alt would be better? From what I understand, four.onum1 is preferred, but it is not that descriptive as I would like.
-How big of a problem this kind of naming is and where the problems/compatibility issues would be likely to occur?
I'm also intersted to hear about possible ways to fix it. I found www.typophile.com/node/80760 where a "Rename Glyphs by Regex" script by Adam Twardoch was mentioned. This sounds like a tool for the job if it renames glyphs also in the opentype code and classes? However, I didn't find the actual script from Google. Is it publicly available, or should I just turn to Adam directly?