On average, which weight of a typeface would be more suitable for text in a webpage or document intended for screen viewing: "Regular", or "Book"?
Like most things in a relativistic universe: it all depends. One man’s Medium is another man’s Book, and one or the other might be more suitable depending on the size used on the webpage. However, because of all the variables involved, I doubt that you can come up with a hard, fast rule that says “Always used Regular for sizes 14px and below, and always used Book for sizes 15px and above.”
Unfortunately, one size does not fit all, nor is your calling plan really unlimited. Welcome to Twenty-first Century America.
A Book in a publication that’s is printed on bad stock by an indifferent printer may turn out looking like a Regular. A Regular printed on expensive glossy paper by a printer who does not know his job may look like a Book.
It depends, in other words, on circumstances. Study those, or work with printers who are knowledgable…
Digitally, what has both Book and Regular as weights?
Quite a few FontFonts have both:
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/celeste
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/info-text
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/kievit
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/max
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/meta (Normal & Book)
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/milo (Regular & Text)
https://www.fontfont.com/fonts/milo-serif
Captured from web.archive.org on 28 Feb 2018. view this capture