Riccardo Sartori13 February 2012 · 07:19Definitely interesting, but it could be improved, especially at the bottom.
Jean Paul Beumer13 February 2012 · 07:32This is just a first draft Riccardo, I'm improving it all the time ;-) For some strange reason the bottom has been flattened; I can assure you it's not so in the draft. Also a draft for /s/.
Nick Cooke27 February 2012 · 08:12This is going to take a VEEEEERRRRRRYYYYYY long time if you are going to show a potential font letter by letter. And you'd do better in the 'Critique' forum.
Hrant H Papazian27 February 2012 · 10:29If Matthew Carter were here, he'd ask to see the "n" and "o" first... hhp
Nick Shinn28 February 2012 · 11:56No, I do not like. Driving a design with detail-styling tricks is a superficial way to conceptualize a new typeface, and can only produce a superficial result. I hope you appreciate my critique, please don’t set your dog on me.