here is an identity i'm working on for a monthly publication that features works of nonfiction that are under 400 words long.. any thoughts? i've got a couple other directions, but i guess this is what i like best.

this is what i'm sending to the client this evening.. thoughts?
400words_concepts01.pdf (99.3 k) |
I'm not a fan of D, but you've got to experiement with these things haven't you?
A's nice, but perhaps a bit too nice. It'd be useful to know what kind of non-fiction this publication is looking to publish. I guess they'll say 'anything and everything' but they must have a direction in mind -- is the direction scientific? religious? serious and formal? loose and humorous?
I actually really like B: it looks like the title of a 70s naturist photography book. Not that I own any 70s naturist photography books, but you (hopefully don't) know what I mean.
Seriously, it looks like with a bit of work it could, well, work. A little spacing (between w and o, and r and d) and a slight resizing and loosening of the 400, and I think it could work. I won't promise anything though
C is the most coherant concept, though I actually prefer your handwritten (I presume) in your first post. If you tidied the sript up a little on that one (the R's and the tail on the f promarily) I think it could be a really nice idea.
The regularity of the script in C is a little mundane compared to the example in your opening post. I'll add my name to the list of admirers of that engraved face though -- it's lovely.
jordan
A: I'm not a fan of this. I've never like swash caps in one word without any sort of custom ligatures to unify them. It always struck me as a bunch of beauty contestants in a row, rather than an integrated team.
B: I really like the type, but the visual cues draw cultural and historical associations that don't feel relevant or wanted for your purpose.
C: I think this is the most appropriate, though I prefer the less formal feel of the original script. I think this one is worth further efforts and variations. I like the contrast of the informal against the formal, but with all hand-written forms (Ermine doesn't strike me as an engraved face, or am I wrong?).
D: This one doesn't feel bad to me, but it doesn't feel right to me either. It strikes me more as a title that's logo-ish, rather than a logo that speaks to writing.
I join the chorus singing for the first concept: the 'WORDS' looks great. And I like the nearly matching stroke-thickness between the thin parts of the WORD-letters and the stroke-thickness in your handwriting. That's why I'd vote for version nr. 1.
But the main reason why I prefer the first example is that I think that the different sizes of the two words provide more energy than the two similar sized words in the examples presented in your pdf. So I would start by reworking the 'Fourhundred' a bit.
Another idea concerning the Fourhundred/400: have you already tried to draw something like that swinging f-bow with the 4? That could be nice because of their formal similarity.
I liked your original concept of combining a hand-drawn font with a more formal set font. And I believe you can continue that concept as you experiment with a more urban feel. Perhaps a grafiti style of hand-drawn lettering or a broken typewriter look might give the client the edgier/urban look she wants. Then again these could be obvious/trite suggestions. Surban girl from Connecticut might not be the best source for edgy/urban ideas. Keep posting I've enjoyed seeing your process.
here are some sort of rough feeling logos i sent to the client yesterday... more urban outfittery, more hip, some color into the mix.. although it must reproduce well in 1 color, as it will be letterpress printed, and i'm not really grooving on printing a bunch of colors inclose register just for the logo..

Captured from web.archive.org on 21 Oct 2013. view this capture