I don’t think so. It was discussed half a year ago on typophile:
http://www.typophile.com/node/72292

See also: http://www.typophile.com/node/67270#comment-395316

Thank you thank you!
(how did I miss these?!)

An old unsharp snapshot, but I can take a better one for you if you want.

Unbelievable, actually, that Saskia escaped digitalization so far.

Who will win that race?

A bit off topic but loosely related: an exhibition on type design opens tomorrow at a venue in Leipzig. – Just if you happen to be in the area. (It spans the focus on local matadors of the trade, from e.g. Belwe, Tiemann, Tschichold, Drescher, Kapr, K.-H. Lange, to those of us who continue the business nowadays). – I’ll report something later on.

Help a ’merican understand: why a 'ch' ligature in "Schrift" and "zeichnen" but not "Schönheit"? And why a 'ch' lig at all?

Schönheit and Charakter are letterspaced = bold.
Presumably Saskia has no Bold, in the manner of old fraktur, where this convention for emphasis originated.
Allegro makes a good bold for this:
http://www.identifont.com/show?21W

c is only ever followed by h or k in German, so making these ligatures was an efficiency.