This thread ran to 1 pages of replies and only one was recovered, so replies are missing.
No.
But perhaps I should add some monospaced styles!
**
BTW, I don't know about affordability, but I've tried to make it value for money: the ‘text’ fonts at $59 have a range of features (small caps, fractions, superiors &c.) in Extended Latin encodings, 700 glyphs per font—which is comparable to many such similarly loaded contemporary typefaces. The display weights (without small caps, &c.) also have the Extended Latin encoding, and the four basic sets of figures (tabular/proportional/lining/oldstyle), 280 glyphs for $39, the same price the original Type 1/TrueType Bodoni Egyptian sold for, which had only basic Western encoding and no figure alternates, just over 200 characters per font.
The full family at $349 for 8 weights of roman, 14 fonts in all, accounts for the majority of sales, so that price point has proven to be quite realistic.
I didn't mean to say that your font is overpriced (indeed, it seems roughly in line with the pricing of most high quality families from independent foundries) but that $349 is outside the likely budget of the typical home user such as myself. Most fonts (except for "novelty" display styles) are aimed squarely at the professional design market and the price reflects that. Good fonts are lot like good camera lenses: most non-professionals (with the exception of a few hobbyists with nice jobs) can't really afford them, but that doesn't stop us from admiring the when we see them ;)
As for a monospaced version, I don't think that would be necessary. You've already got the early 20th century "industrial" look down.
Captured from commoncrawl.org on 26 Apr 2015. original URL