An old favorite. http://www.flickr.com/photos/stewf/tags/type:face%3Dbodoniegyptian/
Santiago,
It was a feature I've seen on some Bodoni interpretations.
I liked it, but on a slab serif there was only room for it in the very lightest weights.
Similarly, I gave the lining dollar two vertical bars on the lightest weights, but only one elsewhere.
Some other letter forms change with weight:
This italic treatment is taken from Century. I used it before, in Worldwide.
**
Matt, always nice to see one's fonts in use, no matter how!
**
Thanks Aaron!
Yes, that's been pointed out before.
Quite a coincidence, as I've never been to the Czech Republic.
Once I had the basic rough concept (blackletter meets monoline hexagon), it pretty much drew itself -- although I softened the joints.
So I would imagine the designer of the lottery logo had the same experience.
That would account for the similarity of proportion in the execution.
http://www.amazon.com/Very-Merry-Cookie-Party-Christmas/dp/0811866750/re...
They managed with the original version, without small caps and the Fraction feature.
Looks nicer than my sister's copy of a book of chocolate recipes. AFAICT, it's all set in Century Gothic. Monotype Century Gothic. Not a very choccy choice, IMAO. Mind, I get the feeling when looking through printed goods that things like Avant Garde are kind of 'in' up here in Incompetent-banker-land.
There are a couple of questions that I was expecting to be asked, but as nobody has done so, allow me:
Nick, why are there no italics for the extreme weights (Thin and Black)?
It would have been a lot of work, the Thin requiring much delicate drawing, and the Black being awkward to design/draw. And I reason that those weights would rarely if ever be licensed or used by designers.
Why are there no small caps, fractions, superiors and inferiors, in the Thin, Extra Light and Black weights?
Again, it would have been a lot of work, which I don't believe would ever have been used. These are "expert" features used in body text, so are not required in display weights.
***
Was I correct in my assumptions?
Is there no call for Thin italic or Black small caps?
This truly is a beautiful piece of work.
My only question is in regards to pricing. I see on myfonts it is currently $245 with the promotion and $350 without it.
With the lack of weights/styles what justifies the pricing when I could purchase Archer with 25 Styles for $280 and get all the weights that weren't created for Bodoni Egyptienne or even spend $50 more when the Bodoni promotion ends and get all 40 styles of archer for $400.
14 styles of Bodoni Egyptienne for $245
25 styles of Archer for $280
It makes it hard to consider Bodoni when I am getting 11 additional weights for $35 with Archer.
I only bring this up because I am currently very seriously considering this purchase myself and I am having to decide between the two. When I hear a designer say "it would have been a lot of work", this makes me questions the overall integrity of the font. I am not so sure HFJ said the same thing when designing Archer and is this evidenced by the weights/styles available. It may be easier for me to justify spending that $35 and going with Archer even though this is such a new and beautiful font.
Both of these are fine designs.
The standard EULA for Archer is very different from the EULA for Bodoni Egyptian, so your intended usage could tip things.
Compare this:
http://www.typography.com/home/eula.php
and this:
http://new.myfonts.com/fonts/shinn/bodoni-egyptian-pro/regular/buy.html
(click on view license)
Nick's standard EULA is far more liberal, allowing public PDFs and modifications.
Also, Nick's EULA is for 5 computers, and you're quoting the H&J price for one.
Plus, Bodoni Egyptian is available with an @font-face license at FontSpring.
Finally, Archer is everywhere, Bodoni Egyptian is not (yet!)
When I hear a designer say "it would have been a lot of work", this makes me questions the overall integrity of the font.
Certainly, integrity may be defined as each font in a typeface family having exactly the same characters and features.
I sacrificed a little of that for what I considered increased utility. Rather than skimping on features and styles in some weights, please think of it as generosity in other weights :-)
When comparing weights, it's also useful to consider their range, not just their number.
Captured from web.archive.org on 11 Sep 2019. view this capture