Typophile

Mixing Garamonds in "The No-Asshole Rule"

butterick

I was examining a paperback copy of the book "The No-Asshole Rule" in the airport. I was curious how you get a whole book out of a title that seems fairly self-explanatory.

The text was set in ITC Garamond, which would be bad enough on its own, but the italic used in the text was not ITC Garamond italic, but rather Adobe Garamond italic. At that point, the book lost all credibility, because despite the title, it was clear that an asshole had been allowed to handle the typography. No-Asshole Rule: flagrantly violated.

Yet that seemed harsh. Surely the designer is not an asshole. Maybe just inept? Or afflicted with bad taste? But ultimately neither of these explanations was convincing.

First, this is a book that's in an airport bookstore as a paperback. That means it's popular and the publisher has already sold a bunch of copies. There's budget to hire a decent book designer.

Second, to combine ITC Garamond and Adobe Garamond like this requires a willful act of perversity and disharmony. It would be easier to just use ITC Garamond italic. But here, the book designer expended time and labor to produce something even uglier.

So, I'm sticking with asshole.

You are assuming some actual thought went into that decision. My guess is that 4th edition paperbacks that end up in airports are done "by computer" meaning humans are forbidden from taking part in the process because they require an hourly rate and health insurance. My guess is that Adobe Garamond Italic came earliest on the font menu so was selected. No one cares what poor schleps who can only buy books in airports have to suffer. After all, they are about to get crammed into a tincan with bad air and poor service where they will not only contract some dreaded disease but be late for their meeting anyway. ;-) That surely is a job coveted only by assholes.

Maybe someone was foolishly relying on Panose font matching and it went horribly awry. But yeah, using ITC Garamond for text in 2010 is pretty awful.

Captured from web.archive.org on 23 Jan 2015. view this capture