I am assuming the first example is the original. The second R definitely looks wrong.

I think the final example works best, although you might want to try moving the end of the middle stroke slightly to the left. As it is it will work.

Example 1 is the best; there is no need to match the position of the crossbars in F and R. The R in example 2 looks like bad, the F in example 3 looks bad. And maybe this is just because the image is poorly rendered, but buy a better version of Eurostile/Microgramma. The M, A, N, and T in this one appear awkwardly drawn; it looks much better with Linotype Eurostile.

You could also have a look at Forza.
http://typography.com/fonts/font_overview.php?productLineID=100041

I would be more concerned over the width of the letters.
Each glyph in a typeface is something of a compromise, optimized to work with every other glyph, so any particular combination in a word may not be ideal.
In this word, the M is really wide, and the F quite narrow, drawing attention to the middle of the word, when really the initial letter is the most important.
So why not make the F a bit wider (and possibly the T), and the M narrower, and see if that improves the whole?

BTW, please make images no wider than 588 pixels, to avoid scrolling.

Hi Guys,

I actually like Forza, I like it better when I squash it a little, does anyone else like this version or hav I killed it?

>I actually like Forza

Many people do, it's a fine face. My guess is, there will be more widths eventually, but when you scale it as you have, then are you using Forza anymore?