mmmmm,is not very similar to the symantec?

http://www.symantec.com

I think the graphic treatment of the 2 leaves or whatever could be integrated into the type a little better. Right now it seems a little unbalanced because of that. I think #6 is the best solution, but can be explored a little more in terms of font and aperance like increasing the weight and such.

> Juan Pablo De Gregorio: symantec? yeah ... it is .. but I haven't copied ... ;-|

> Pavel Gorin. Pavel you're right. I'll play around with the font and may be will make the right part darker, and will add "Services LLC" and here we go, it should be balanced.

Regards: Garik
Borne in USSR

Garik, the mark is just too big. Its commanding more attention than the words. What are you trying to communicate a mark? I don't think so.

You must be old the USSR hasn't been around for a long time.

May be this?

Regards: Garik
Borne in USSR

Why the dot? It halts you after Swift (a full stop), which doesn't convey speed to me. There is no .internet TLD, so that can't be it. It seems to be almost a cliche.

Im not sure if the company name is SwiftInternet but i think you dont need to bunch all that into one element. What if Swift was there on its own with the logo as a mark, and internet services lcc would be its own separate element below it or where-ever.
Just a suggestions :D

Pavel is right. 'Internet Services' should be one item and 'Swift' the other. It appears you're splitting 'internet services' in mid-thought.

> darrel & >Pavel Gorin
I have done that (see # 6 and 9) but the client did not like it. Even more :-( requested new mockups. Will post them once finished. Much appreciate your critiques.