Typophile

How large on the face?

1985

I'm sure this has been asked before so feel free to point me to an existing thread.

Obviously there are critical ratios, cap height/x-height, overhang etc, but these ratios can exist at different sizes.
e.g. 700/500 = 750/536 approx.

I have some experience drawing type, but it occurred to me whilst starting a new design that there might be some advantage to drawing at a specific size and I would like to be aware of this at the outset to avoid possible problems later on.

I'm inclined to draw large on the face as I have more options for stem widths etc.

A little bit of guidance, what to watch out for &c. would be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance

Andrew

The cap height of most Postscript fonts is between 680 and 700 units, so for the sake of not confusing end users it’s probably best to keep your design within that range. People start to get confused when your twelve points looks like any other font at fourteen.

Thanks, James. Is that the only factor?

In general I leave a talus (internal leading) of less than 1% (and most of that at the top) and fill the rest with top of ascenders to bottom of descenders. And it's good to allow the cap accents to float above the top of the EM.

hhp

A talus? Can you explain anymore, Hrant? Thanks

You leave space within the EM above the top of the ascenders and below the bottom of the descenders, to avoid collisions in the case of flush setting (plus to meet the size expectations of users, as James said). The sum of these two "blank" spaces is the talus. It's not a common term, but "internal leading" is cumbersome and potentially confusing.

Also, it's smart to leave a greater proportion of the talus on top, because ascenders are much more frequent than descenders, hence benefit from the greater room to breathe.

hhp

Right, that makes sense, I shall use the term from now on. What did you mean by 1%? Sorry to be trivial, thanks for your help!

I don't know why I wrote 1%, I wasn't thinking straight.
It's 5%. In an EM of 1000 that's 50 units.

hhp

Captured from web.archive.org on 3 Feb 2010. view this capture