Josev27 June 2009 · 18:14Why do we use the term “squooshed” when it was obviously extended? Just curious. There were better descriptions for this effect in my early days of specifying type — like pseudo extended, for instance.
paulstonier27 June 2009 · 18:33““Squooshed” is our way of describing a font that has been squeezed graphically (a term coined by “Miss Tiffany” I think). - Mike Yanega” http://typophile.com/node/59100
Stephen Coles27 June 2009 · 19:33It could be squooshed from the top. If you’re stretching in one direction it could always be interpreted as squooshing/smooshing/smashing in the other direction. The result and the crime is the same.