Hello
This is a design for a very small female clothing business. For the age of 18-35. Simplistic, Japanese style was used for the store furnishing. This is the logo.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| camellialogo2[1].jpg | 192.05 KB |
Hello
This is a design for a very small female clothing business. For the age of 18-35. Simplistic, Japanese style was used for the store furnishing. This is the logo.
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| camellialogo2[1].jpg | 192.05 KB |
second that, it's a dreadful color. but you can fix that anytime. go for the single heart as the point on the I in the first direction. the size of that heart in the first exampleis good too--the second direction has them too small and too big, attracting too little or too much attention. the first one's heart matches the weight of the serif on the top bar of the letter a next to it rather well.
Cotton candy pinks aren't really appropriate for 18-28 year olds. They might see it as either "old lady" or "little girl."
Honestly? Combined with the heart over the i, I'd have rolled my eyes at this logo when I was in my early twenties. A hot color could change that...I'd head towards richer, bolder shades of pink that pop - like a warm, saturated magenta.
This flower might be a good image to hit with the eyedropper:

Here goes the variations.
http://img36.imageshack.us/img36/6949/camellialogocolorvariat.jpg
Guys. I am currently experimenting with Georgia. It is a font the client really likes. But I wonder if it's good to use such a commonly known typeface on a logo? Are there certain things I should be aware when I use Georgia, like its kerning or if I can modify the characters. Btw, is it legal to modify typefaces?
You mentioned simplistic Japanese styling for the store furnishings. Was that supposed to be a source of inspiration? Could it be a source of inspiration?
Your client may like what you've produced at this point, but with the heart on the 'i' it plays as kawaii kitsch, and not very hip or well-directed towards an 18-35 female demographic.
--
Nick Hladek
Imo your current styling does kinda lean toward "grandma" like others are saying, but it also leans toward rich conservative. Is this 18-35 demographic the young hipsters or the polo and pimm's crowd?
I this Lex's suggestion of black type is a good idea.
Perhaps a more graphic or geometric styling of the flower would bump up the vitality of the mark?
part of the problem could be alleviated if this wasn't a 100% computer generated project. an illustrative logo would seem so much more beautiful and engaging. inspiration for that could be in tattoo flowers, japanese tattoos, etc. That type of styling would certainly seem more fit for the age group.
http://fc06.deviantart.com/fs36/f/2008/247/4/5/Pink_Flower_heart_tribal_...
prob. lots of good floral henna examples out there--see the last image here
http://www.madregear.com/item_201/Motherink-Maternity-Tattoos.htm
Thank you for all the feedback, typophile!
This logo is actually hand drawn by me, then scanned into Illustrator. I like your idea, evanbrog, but like Phinney said that it wouldn't be ideal for a logo that will go onto clothing tags and such. To clarify, this shop targets the mid to upper-class, not very hipster and mainstream. And also this is a very small store, the floorplan just about the size of a single decker bus.
And all those Grandma comments just make me laugh! Talk about how off-the-brief my work turned out. I wonder how Victoria's Angels manage to use so much pink and still look appealing!?
well for the audience, it wouldn't have to look so punk rock. but i disagree as to this not being able to be done on a clothing tag.
http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/5577/EdHardy_BlackT-Shirt_Tag1.jpg
Hmmm, good point, I was thinking of cases where the logo is essentially embroidered on the tag. But if it's printed CMYK process at press resolutions, well, you can do almost any darn thing you like.
That being said, in the long run logos may be used in all sorts of other ways, and an identity design generally should include a single-color version that can be reproduced under appalling conditions. :)
Cheers,
T
Captured from web.archive.org on 23 Jun 2013. view this capture