Trebuchet is a very nice face. It's a well-designed neutral sans with a touch of U.S. Highway for extra clarity. Its personality gives blogs that professional but still personal human voice. Can we hear it for Trebuchet? Humor me.
I used to dig it, but now I find it a little on the ugly cousin side. The super short as/descenders make me wilt like an unloved macaroni flower. I used to find the g nice and original, but it calls attention to itself now. I sincerely hope I have not changed your outlook; these are strictly my own thoughts. ; )
As aluminum says, I think Trebuchet is good for web, because of the limited list available for that (at this moment, maybe not anymore in the very near future). I like the fact that it has a real italic, not just an oblique.
And don’t forget: Trebuchet is a Vincent Connare design! There is life after Comic Sans…
I mean it: for me, Trebuchet is a good design. Human touch but still serious and convenient for screen.
Another thing I like about Trebuchet: lowercase l different from Uppercase I (not very common in sans designs).
I only mentioned Comic Sans because many of us hate it so much, but Trebuchet is a very different stuff. Not every popular font is a bad font, right?
Good home page, though :|
Yes, lovely iuse of Arial :-)
Maybe I should have used Trebuchet? Just kidding, that would be really Amateur.
I think Trebuchet works really well on TV. It’s the typeface I use when I need to set subtitles.
AHAHAHAHAHAHA. There you go.
Trebuchet, the thinking mans comic sans.
>Ok, I am curious about what do you use.
Like all "very Good Designers", lovely types like this one...
http://typophile.com/node/53499
...unless of course the ID was for a "friend" :-P
i remember the first time i took trebuchet seriously was when i had to update some really small ingredient labels for boutique chocolate at my old work, i thouhgt 'gee that tiny 5-point type looks good, then i discovered it was trebuchet, which means it's one i think of as good for really small printed stuff if you need a system font for the job.
anywho...
>>the Windows fall-back font for Lucida Grande
Sii beat me to the punch, but Lucida Sans/Grande is practically the only typeface that has a native system variant on every Operating system. For Linux, Luxi, although not Lucida, is certainly a very closely related cousin and Lucida Sans also ships standard with Java.
"Yet another case of Microsoft copying Apple in advance."
A common misconception among busily entrenching kleptocrats. :-p
"...Lucida Sans/Grande is practically the only typeface that has a native system variant on every Operating system..."
Not surprising, any operating system with native blurry-bot rendering needs a simplified san serif (or ten), so their blurry-bot rendering will not show up, (at the top of your windows at least).
Cheers!
I still quite object to the fact that the endash and hyphen look exactly the same, a clear error.
—
Joe Clark
http://joeclark.org/
I MADE THE FIRST EVER BITMAPS OF TAHOMA FOR THE WINDOWS 95 SYSTEM ENGINEERS since Mr Carter delivered Mac Font-tastic Plus negative sidebearing bitmaps. I had to remake them and change some things and compile them into 2.fnt files so they could be usable...so there.... start whinging about Tahoma now
@sii - to be honest, i was confused by his post...
Confused? Well, there is an inverse relationship between the font(s) we think of as highly readable in high resolution text, and the font(s) we are force-fed because they are easy to render at low resolutions.

What to do? Sheep love Trebuchet, Verdana and Lucida anything — wolves roam.
Cheers!
Big Brother in Holland's first logo was in Trebuchet then they took out the words and turned to shite.
Newsnight had it as a logo for years now it is something so boring no one knows what it is.
Apple's iCards were in Comic Sans then they went and made Chalkboard after they copied the trash can and multitasking from Xerox and Microsoft and re-invented System 7 as iOS 7 but no Newton support or TrueType GX.
Actually Apple swiped the whole GUI idea from Xerox PARC
That may be true, but it shows that having a nice idea does not count as much in the end as turning it into a product that is accepted and appreciated by a large audience. And that is only the start. Looking back, we may say that Apple almost did not survive the starting period because Lisa was a flop and that Amiga did not survive in the longer run.
For a long while the only personal computer with true multitasking was the Amiga.
Hmm … Amiga … my former colleague Jelle Bosma used to have one. He was even able to program an editor with which he could read in, on-screen edit and export IK-Format on that machine. That way he did a part of the corrections on Forlane, the predecessor of Cambria, while working at Scangraphic. Where did Amiga got lost again? Not being able to switch to the PowerPC or Intel platform in time? Windows 3.1? Others outbeating them on the video-editor software market?
having a nice idea does not count as much in the end
But for some of us being honest does.
Amiga died because of zero marketing - its eventual owners made more money killing it; because culture and money aren't the same thing. On every technical front it was superior to anything out there, years in advance. I ran Fontographer via Mac emulation, and it ran faster than on a Mac; I also had a Windows emulator (which however required a card). My 3000 is still in the garage. :-) The 500 I had donated to a small Armenian TV show.
hhp
All resurrected threads must include a reference to the Amiga and Fidel Castro's Rolex, so just setting the record straight.
Did I ever tell you about the time I put an Amiga in a freezer... http://jdanddiet.blogspot.com/2013/05/retro-gamer-article-extras-interce...
Captured from web.archive.org on 25 Apr 2015. view this capture