Quite like it. Shall leave it for the more experience members of this community to critique it.
- san ideos

I like the idea, but I think the tail of the "y" is a little too short.
Also the a curve (at top) is a bit too "open" and you could try to make the K and k merged instead of a horizontal line between the two parts.
I think you'd better use dots or (unrotated) squares instead of the shapes you now have as points.

Keep up the good work! ;)

Kind regards,
Martijn van Berkel

Thank you all for the feedback! Summer semester has started, so once again I have no time to update this as much as I would want to.

Anyway, I'll critique myself:
1. vxy thin, add a little width to w
2. top of K looks too heavy
3. what's up with S?
4. UVW too narrow?
5. widths are not consistent, some look a bit heavy than the others. for example, B, w, x, etc
6. make this monolinear, I don't think the width differences work on this. I don't know.
7. g looks weak, as is j and a
8. proportions are really off

It would be nice to see a pdf ;)
Crossbar on G is a bit low.
M has a heavy middle that seems to have sunk to the baseline.
B and S are funny shapes.
Eye of e is too small?
I don't think the Kk with crossbar is a problem.
p and d are not good curves.
u maybe too wide.
Proportions of numerals are off. Bottom half should be bigger. Question mark should flow rather than the corner?

I think you can definitely get a worthwhile font out of this, just need to make the shapes harmonise better :)

Now that I haven't looked at this thing for two weeks, I can see that B is weird in relation to the rest. Thank you Ben for the feedback. It's true that p and d are really off, due to the sharp curves that form from the stem. I seem to have trouble making them smoother like b and q with the x-height and width. And yes, the numerals are way, way off.

I'll post a pdf when I update this over next week's weekend; I'll probably redraw this from scratch to reconsider things.