A) I can appreciate what you’re TRYING to do, but it’s not working... too crowded, the “g”s look too stressed like that. I kinda like the fan coming off the B

B) Too hard to read the BP, sphere makes no sense whatsoever to a printer. Text Boring (though that may be what they wanted)

C) Nice and clean, but the green color is a little light/weak. Icon is nice, but seems off-center. HATE the stacked version

D) I think i like this one the best, but i hate the Avant Garde (very hard to be original with since the first LaserWriter Plus). Love the icon over the other three. I dunno, maybe the Avant Garde is conveying the “budget” idea after all... but don’t mix it with another face (like on the right). If you do stick with it, Tighten/fix the kerning/letterspacing - as a logo, it’s gotta be PERFECT. Perhaps run the two words together with the color change.

Thank you for your suggestions Scott!

I’ve made some changes to these logos. Please let me know what logo is your favorite and why (anyone). If you could change something about that logo what would it be?

The mark in the version B - I’m certain I saw it used in one of existing logos posted on LogoPond not long ago. And that logo was said to resemble the Elastic Digital one.

None of them works.
Sorry.

What I would do would be plain type “Budghet Printing” in two lines on negative space (for BW version) with tear paper edge. Would be more suitable and original.

I also think that if you do budget printing your logo should be simple in terms of shapes, type, colours and everything. I’m not saying it should be dull and down to earth trivial. It should be exciting, but budget oriented.

Think of anything that says to you “Budget” and see if you can work out an idea out of it.

Your logos may be ok for some other business (but majorly reworked) just not for your company’s business.
___________
Robert Koritnik