I remember a well written description of of what constitutes a typographic revival, but I can't find it. any help appreciated.
Call It What It Is by John Downer?
Also: Revival
This is an interesting feature about type revivalism:
http://www.typeculture.com/academic_resource/articles_essays/pdfs/tc_art...
"Only when the design fails does it draw attention to itself; when it succeeds, it's invisible." (John D. Berry)
Nick: Ergo, all award winners are crap.
Award competitions are judged on the basis of looking at type, not reading it.
But John Berry has made the now common error of saying 'invisible' when he should say 'transparent'. A crystal goblet, to use Beatrice Warde's famous metaphor, isn't invisible, only transparant. Like good typography, it doesn't obscure the contents, but it can also delight with its own shape.
I have sometimes used the 'Belgian beer glass' explanation of typography: it's transparent, but the shape of the glass tells you what kind of beer is in it.
This is also, of course, true of wine glasses if one takes the care to serve wine in an appropriately shaped glass. In this case, the shape not only tells you what kind of wine you are about the drink, but also affects the bouquet and flavour.
Captured from web.archive.org on 4 Aug 2014. view this capture