If a line break creates a hiccup in readability, does it make for bad typography?
On a client's business card:
special gifts
adorned with
puppy and teddy
bear illustrations
The measure is short to showcase a portion of the client's illustration.
In visual context, the line breaks are exactly where they need to be, but the interruption of "teddy bear" is unnerving to me.
Only, not as unnerving as the alternative...
special gifts
adorned with
puppy and teddy bear
illustrations
Thoughts?
Can you go to 5 lines?
BTW, try an ampersand.
hhp
Are they as good as chimp pix?
special gifts
adorned with
illustrations of
puppies and
teddy bears
or Hrant's:
special gifts
adorned with
puppy and
teddy bear
illustrations
Excellent! Thanks, gentlemen.
Hrant, I've got the curse of the Grammar Nazi, and I can't conscionably use an ampersand if it's not in a title or the like.
These are fantastic solutions to the specific problem I used as an example. But what about the theory behind it? What if I did have to keep it to four lines? When it comes to design, is it better to break the line for readability and have an inappropriately ragged edge, or is it best to keep them looking balanced and break up words that should probably be kept together?
> is it better to break the line for readability
The idea of readability tends to apply to long, immersive text only. For such short text looks surely trumps readability every time. Frankly any problem people will have reading that smoothly will be momentary and immediately forgotten.
BTW, if you center the text you can (and in fact often should) have great variance in line length.
hhp
> ...text looks surely trumps readability every time.
I think you're right.
> ...center the text...
Agreed! Unfortunately, it does not apply in this particular case, as it is only on a business card, left edge, to make room for the illustrator's graphic on the the right.
Do you need a hyphen with that compound modifier?
Captured from web.archive.org on 8 Nov 2013. view this capture