I am in the process of refining this wedding monogram.
Can I get your guys opinion?
Which version do you prefer?

| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| monogram.jpg | 46.55 KB |
I am in the process of refining this wedding monogram.
Can I get your guys opinion?
Which version do you prefer?

| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| monogram.jpg | 46.55 KB |
I favor version B. It's a bit more subtle, but the line break still gets the point across. I don't see trying too hard to be clever here at all. It's a wedding . . . to the people involved, you can never try too hard.
Also, don't dumb down a good design just because everyone might not get it at first. Chances are that everyone will get it right away anyway, as they'll all know the bride&groom's names.
penn
I can swear I commented on this mark elsewhere (at logopond ?), and my impression still remains that it's too reminiscent of a Planck's constant, which pulls in quantum physics, which in turn is associated with uncertainty concepts and such .. not something that everyone would want to have on a wedding cake :-)

.
yes, just as meantioned above, I'm not even sure of the letters...
is it i og l? and I also think of an n...
..that joins to an h? but hopefully the guests know.
It looks very sleek and minimalistic, is this typical traits of the couple?
or is there a way you could make the 'two parts / people' visually different in the logo? As they 'join' in the circle to a unit, you cld nicely create the letters of two simmilar but differnt fonts, maybe..? showing a joint of two items. Just a thought.
Captured from web.archive.org on 21 Oct 2013. view this capture