Twer it me typedog, I would standardize the spacing between the letters (give them some air), and then I would futz with the "counters," or interior spaces (open them up!!!), to reflect the spacing. That may counter the unfortunate double r's and z which unfortunately bring quite a bit of space to the equation. What I am saying is that there needs to be some daylight! You could probably heavy up the horizontals of the z's a tad also.

Michael

Front: IMO there is no apparant relation between the upper and the lower half. No shared margins etc. Also the lower part is somewhat floating in space.

Back is nice.

. . .
Bert Vanderveen BNO

Typerror and Bert both make good points...and I would suggest you definitely check your kerning on GUERRIZMO. I would also maybe bump up the weight of the rest of the text, because it looks mighty thin compared to your heavy type logo. For the G on the back, have you thought about using the same type as you have on GUERRIZMO? Throwing in a third typeface, like you have done, really separates the card into a Front and Back, instead of seeing this card as one complete unit.

Good luck!

Thanks for the advise people, There are only two font families in the whole design. I will rework with the suggestions.

bert_vanderveen

I intended to make the card as simple as possible because I not only work with younger people I also work with older business people.

Guerrizmo+Design