could someone with a bit of historical type knowledge help me id this typeface... it was taken from an old hudson bay catalogue poster....

i don’t remember an agreement being made. Additionally the variance in the font appearance is simply dictated by the process through which the signs were created. This sample is from a CATALOGUE, a PRINTed piece therefore a typeface must have been set and named. As well 200,000+ fonts ... right. Please someone else take a stab at this.
Bart, I don’t think the fact that the catalog was printed means a typeface had to be used. There are any number of ways that hand-drawn lettering could be reproduced as part of a printed page. For example, a metal plate could be made and used for the printing. Do they ever use the same lettering for anything except the logo?
- Mike Yanega
You also said this was from an “old .. catalogue poster”. If ’old’ is before the 1980’s, the 200,000+ font statement doesn’t apply. Digital fonts were only starting to be widely used by the mid-to-late ’80’s, and the number of fonts was not so large until relatively recently.
I have looked at books I have on type, and so far I have not been able to match this blackletter style.
- Mike Yanega
Captured from web.archive.org on 7 Dec 2008. view this capture