I used to think choosing the right typeface for our new logo would not be any major issue. I used to. We have developed a graphical element that represents our company core. We are a communication and collaboration technology company and the logo should evoke communication between (two) sides. The next step is a typeface.
After a few suggestions from our designer and several own attempts I realized the font plays a biiig role in the logo! I discovered the whole new world of typography. Beautiful.
Being (just) a CEO, I don’t go too much into detail, but I think I am able to understand what it takes to create a good typo and yes, to use it properly.
After quite a extensive research, we (designer and us, in the company) have made a shortlist of typefaces. These, in our opinion, work quite well with the slanted, dynamic graphical element.
The first two use FF Daxline (gradiented web version and a spot one). The third is an alternative with RR Lesmore Condensed. All in italic. Please see the attachments.
Daxline is good, not so common as Dax, but inherited the good things. Lesmore gives a different flavor. To me, a traditional, elegant.
My question to you, esteemed typography pros, is whether Daxline is a clever choice and/or whether would you suggest any other fonts (and why).
Thank you!
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| cwlogo_grad.jpg | 13.59 KB |
| cwlogo_spot.jpg | 13.4 KB |
| cwlogo_altles.jpg | 14.33 KB |