I’ve noticed that the letter J is rarely used these days. Do you think I should bother including a J in my fonts or can I just leave it out?
Without J you couldn’t have jazz, and that’s not cool...
Yes you could so have jazz. You could try something, you know—improvize. What would jazz musicians do if J disappeared overnite? They would improvize man.
Like Rayberto, I am kidding.
Ray, just leave it out and plug it in don’t worry about it breakin’. It’s factory-made and guaranteed and would I fake it?
j a m e s
I think it would help global warming more to leave out the letter e and t. They are used very frequently so all of our text would become much shorter so we would need less paper and not have to cut down as many trees. See, there is a perfect example, “trees” would become simply “rs” and if we also left out r and s? well, there would be fewer rs cut down—I mean fewer cut down. See how simple that is?
ChrisL
I am all up for using the “Yeshua” spelling. So no need for a J. :)
_____________________________________________
Personal Art and Design Portal of Ivan Gulkov
www.ivangdesign.com
Seriously, the alphabet we use currently has evolved over time in a completely willy nilly fashion with a great many redundancies that don’t really enrich language at all. As designers, we all know this, yet we it meekly accept it as a fact of life. But does it need to be like that? NO. It doesn’t. We’re designers, after all. I think that now would be as good a time as any for some rationalization and culling of unnecessary and wasteful letters, in much the same way that the dozens of different and idiocentric weights and measures systems used in France were culled and replaced by the infinitely more rational metric system at the end of the 18th century.
We could probably whittle the number of letters in the standard alphabet down by 25% to 30%.
Taking the letter “J” as an example: In many languages it is pronounced as a “Y” sound or even an “h”. In French, it is pronounced “zh”, so the assertion that these languages can’t get by without a “j” is simply not true. The name, James is really Iago. Jack is really John which is really Ivan, and so on. Jorge is really George, and is pronound Horhay anyhow! If a “J” sound is really ever actually required, “ge” or “zh” work just fine.
@ jazzhustler: My Norwegian Grandmother, didn’t like any music that didn’t have a polka beat, or sound like it was made up by Vikings in quiet moments between pillagings. Any other form of music, she would denounce fiercely with: “Dat’s yoost yass!” You see. There’s my point; no need for “j”, “th” “u” or even “z”. You’ll always have yass. (or iass, since the “y” is really just a redundancy of the letter “i”) Cutting the alphabet down by 30% is actually quite conservative, when you think about it.
-=®=-
Matthew: More importantly, what did Wynn look like in when in blackletter?
The typical Anglo-Saxon bookhand isn’t what I would classify as blackletter. There are some good examples here:
http://www.wmich.edu/medieval/resources/IOE/mss.html
The wynn is very similar in form to the p, and doubtless easily mistaken for it.
Reminds me of an amazing 1996 Potlatch paper sample book. It was huge and chronicled the career of the fictional “Ben Day” and among his many accomplishments was the creation of the typeface “Cueless.” The specimen page was basically just Trade Gothic or some similar face with the explanation:
“Stalled on a problem, Ben did a statistical study of the standard Roman alphabet, and, finding that the letter q was the least used, eliminated it. It was a typographic apotheosis. The Cueless typeface was born, one of many that Ben was to create.”
Captured from arquivo.pt on 9 Jul 2009. original URL