I'm working on my first titling face as well, so I'm probably not the best person to offer a critique. I think the general direction is unique enough to keep going.

First thing that caught my eye is that the axis of the O and C are almost Italic in nature. The Q seems better. The middle crossbar of E and F seem too short and the top serif on the heavier E seems to form a dark spot. I would try for more consistent ending of your serifs; some are blunt and others sharp. The inside bowl of the R seems to need work as well. The stroke suddenly gets more angular where it comes down into the stem. The smallcap height might be a tad low, but others could weigh in on that better than me.

Stephen

Thank you very much, Stephen. I will take all that into consideration, mainly that thing about the round letters. I designed them like that for no particular reason, so I am still considering changing that. But I do really like this, I think it's going pretty well as it is… and I think this slight tilt on the round letters gives the typeface a certain dynamic it could lack without it.
I guess it's important to say how this typeface came to be: I had this idea while drawing uppercase letters very freely by hand. I was doing them in a very relaxed and quick way, and there was really no consistency in the drawings besides the width of the strokes and the style of the serifs; the serifs were all slightly different, even their lengths. So I thought I'd bring that idea into the computer, where I designed every letter in much the same way, only with vectors. There was to be no copying and pasting, every letter was to be drawn from scratch, to stand on its own, to be unique in relation with the others. This makes all the letters quite original, but by keeping the stroke widths and the style of the serifs, it was supposed to evolve into a typeface, almost like those grungy, printed, irregular serifs like Poliphilus and such.
So this inconsistency in the serifs is part of the charm of the typeface. However, if you can be more specific about what you said regarding the serifs, I will change what I feel is just too much. Maybe I'm missing something.

Again, thank you very much. :)

Hi Ruben,
I think knowing your design criteria it make more sense. What I was refering to with serifs is how, like on the S, the top serif comes to a sharp point whereas other serifs end more rounded or blunt. I think removing sharp edges would give a more natural handmade look if that's what you want it too feel like. Even loosely designed fonts need consistency in some details.

Stephen

Ok, Stephen, I'll look into that. Thanks! :)

BTW, I just noticed that I didn't use the apostrophe on that “'till” (it's a single quote instead), I think the software may have substituted it automatically. Just mentioning it before someone else does! :P

Well, looks like it's just you and me, Stephen… I, for one, am already thinking about my next projects. Have you posted your typeface around here, Stephen? I'd like to see it, share thoughts, maybe rip something off… :P