Typophile

node 4610

unknown

Just found this on a resume writing site,
pet peeve #14 apparently. Surely this
confirms that what we read most we read
best! And that all magazines and newspapers
are printed in Times New Roman. HA!

# 14 - Poor Font Choice

When creating your Word Attachment resume, keep your font simple and easy to read on a computer screen. Be kind to your reader. Do not use italics or extremely difficult to read fonts like Edwardian Script. Font size is just as important as style. 8-point fonts are too small to read, even for Superman.

Microsoft seems to have settled on 10 point Arial as their default font in most of their applications. People are accustomed to reading such on their computer screen. For headings, recruiters shared that 12-point bolded is the best choice.

Recruiters told us that that second best choice is Times Roman as every newspaper and magazine is printing with such. Once again, people�s eyes are accustomed to reading text in this font. However, 10-point Times Roman, (unlike Arial), is too small for a computer screen. It is recommended if you choose Times Roman, use 11 or 12 point. If a resume is difficult to read, a recruiter will simply move onto the next one.

http://resumedoctor.com/PP_Artical15_14.htm#14

unknown

Very true that a recruiter will ignore a hard-to-read r�sum�.

But "every newspaper and magazine" is printed with Times Roman?

Maybe I should just commit sepuku now, and be done with it!

unknown

Another reason to be self-employed.

unknown

I usually balk at a job once they request a resume in Word format.

unknown

Yo! Mr. Darrel - A H A H !
That is why I suggested this woman to have a better cv:
http://www.donadelli.it/ADD_cv_Eng.zip

unknown

> I usually balk at a job once they request a resume in Word format.

What do you prefer? Plain-text, HTML, Flash, PDF?

Si

unknown

Paper. That way I can control what stock my resume and cover letter is on, who printed it, and how it gets handled once I deliver it.

If a client/employer requests a digital copy, PDF. Locked for editing and displays the way I designed it to.

unknown

Alessandro, I don't get it; throughout her CV I see New Baskerville and Frutiger. with passable layout and legible copy. Looks fine in PDF but would look terrible in Word, since half of the features she uses (continuous sidebar, alternate ampersands, small caps) don't display properly in that program.

Why did she need a better CV?

Captured from web.archive.org on 25 May 2005. view this capture