Hi, this is my current personal Project feels kinnda stuck I could use some help please let me know what you think. I have thought about constructing the letters myself. It's supposed to read moh
If you use a graphic image in a design it must mean something -- either immediately understood (in the millesecond you will get for recognition) or readily discovered, which is a pleasant experience for the viewer. The green roof doesn't explain itself and causes an awkward linkage between the m and h. I would advise substance over manipulation. You can't be faulted for explaining yourself in a clear, clean, and concise solution.
@Paul Thanks for your post the roof is supposed to close the o in moh i have noticed that the linkage between m and h seems a little akward, but like I said i got stuck. I would like to keep the o open a little an use the "roof" by itself. Do you think a different font maybe a bit bolder would help? Like I said I am also considering constructing a clear form of the 3 Letters (just a form same line thickness in vertical and horizontal lines) Do you think that would help. I hope the link between m and h won't be so awkward any more
What if you made the 'o' a full letter, entirely in green?
I think if you really want the O as part of the identity mark, then it needs to be immediately recognizable. Even if you went to something with block letters that defined the O as negative space, you'd still be directly conveying the letter as opposed to suggesting it with the caret/hat.
I like #5 better out of the two serif designs, but I think you might want to leave in the "feet" on the M and H to avoid people reading an rr ligature. Overall, it's a good design, with a nice balance of positive and negative space; I think #6 isn't 'solid' enough.
I daresay I like 5 better than 4, but that might be because it reminds me of this.
Captured from web.archive.org on 21 Oct 2013. view this capture