I use Picasa to host images.
All the cool kids and designers seem to use Flickr. Is there any particular advantage I’m missing? Any compelling reason I should use Flickr instead of Picasa?
.... Aside from being cool, I mean.
I use Picasa to host images.
All the cool kids and designers seem to use Flickr. Is there any particular advantage I’m missing? Any compelling reason I should use Flickr instead of Picasa?
.... Aside from being cool, I mean.
Real links instead of JavaScript pseudolinks, meaning every photo has a permalink. Tags, sets, collections. You can upload by E-mail or any number of other methods.
Certain tasks are unreasonably difficult on Flickr, but most tasks aren’t.
—
Joe Clark
http://joeclark.org/
I don’t necessarily buy the “more organized interface” theory... I think that can be pretty subjective. Picasa seemed more straight forward and easier to figure out than Flickr, though I haven’t really spent enough time with Flickr to honestly compare.
the pseudo JavaScript link thing, and uploading via email for Flickr I wasn’t aware of.
OK, I’m sold.
(sign... I got a heck of a lot of crap to move over from the Dark Side)
-=®=-
The API is also pretty awesome. If you have a Wordpress blog, for instance, you can use a plugin to automatically use Flickr as a database of your images if you want to create a photo gallery. That’s what I have on my page Photos.
At my school’s newspaper, we use Flickr to manage all photo content that is going to be published. Editors can comment on which ones they like best, etc., for selection for print. THEN, as an added benefit, our Webmaster can then hotlink to Flickr so that readers can look at higher-res versions and also to comment.
It’s a win-win-win situation.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/dangayle/
+HaleyFiege
Captured from web.archive.org on 9 Jul 2008. view this capture