It's a lovely face, very elegant and finished, but you offer no bold and bold italic, and your price is too high for freelancers to purchase by themselves--and they are the taste-makers you want to target. This face occupies an especially crowded field, and competing faces are more complete, more extensive, and better priced.

It's not THAT outlandishly priced, and not everything needs a bold or bold italic. But that's just my opinion, and I'm not an art director or typographer...

Actually, every text-use family DOES need at least two weights, with matching italics, in order to attract wide use. Adobe's new Arno Pro, an obvious competitor in your "look"...just see how complete and developed that family is, and at a much better price! FF Clifford and H-FJ Requiem would be much bigger news by now, used much more extensively, if their foundries had finished their work and had released them with extra weights. This is not a small issue industry-wide.

@ John

Old thread, but I had a closer look to Toshna these days. Great typeface! With and without other weights. And Clifford is one of the very rare fonts, about which I would say, that they are perfect as they are. Clifford is simply an absolute masterpiece! Except from that I wonder, whether it is possible to create a worthy semibold partner for Clifford because of its darkness. Clifford IS finished. I really would not waste my time with creating semibold styles for Clifford just for filling an expectation of the market.