So, when do we get our next new featured face? Super Duty is nice and all, but in my not-so-humble opinion, I'm ready for something else. Even a non-sponsored face for a while...
This thread ran to 2 pages of replies and only one was recovered, so replies are missing.
Rotating the fonts is great, but it does take time for the good people at Typophile to implement. While a daily or weekly font rotation is wonderful in theory, it would add a lot more work for our friends in the administration arena. The idea of having a sponsored typeface is to help generate revenue to keep this community going. I'm glad they've come up with ideas like this so we aren't subjected to zillions of Google ads and annoying ads from media farms.
Just saying :)
oops i started another post withtout seeing this one first.
sorry.
If we have to paypal a little donation so that we can have 1 or 2 more typefaces to make a rotation with (I agree by the way, it's not such a big job to program), i'm ready to do so.
let's replace it with comic sans !
>>>>>
for the sake of max vox i'm KIDDING of course.
dr
The time that management allows each face to remain in the featured spot is what makes the concept nice from a design standpoint. Three or four faces a year gives each one just enough time to overstay it's welcome a little, but isn't so short that users don't have time to process and latch onto the new look. The look is fluid, but not nebulous.
Really, as long as the face is kind of chunky, I don't think it matters what it is.
There's not just programming to consider, but solicitation of new faces, negotiations, contracts/license agreements, vetting each typeface, bug-testing, etc. Even small chunks of time add up, and take away from running a business and working on a zillion other bug fixes and new features that we request. I don't exactly know what goes on under the hood, but I know a ton of work goes into programming and administering every aspect of this site and it's all a labor of love that we benefit from.
I've personally grown fond of Super Duty and its strength in this application, as I did Beorcana before it - I would echo Eric's sentiments. I'm not sure that I would enjoy a constantly rotating font in all the headers. I mean, I love to see different fonts, but there is a certain comfort factor in coming to Typophile and seeing a consistent look over a period of time. I like the warm fuzziness and stability of it all.
Of course I look forward to being pleasantly surprised when a new typeface is introduced here, but it will be a bit of a shock to the system.
I don't know what the fees for featured faces are, but the folks at Typophile have mentioned this sponsorship program in multiple threads and said interested parties should email them. So that's what I would do.
I'm all for a consistent look; I guess I have the opposite long-term effect from Super Duty as you do? I've grown to quite loathe the typeface as a result of its use on this site. But I might be the only one. I was sad when Beorcana was taken down. That was a nice font for this purpose, in my opinion. I will honestly state that I'm probably the least qualified to speak on such matters, though.
I got it from upstairs that they do hope to change the font soon. They also say that if you want your font to be used contact for an ad rate sheet.
I think this is all very subjective. Yes, Super Duty is a lot like watching Die Hard over and over. But, Jimmy G is an awesome designer and the font has its purposes. I was one who didn't really like Beorcana for this purpose and was happy to see it go. (But I do love the typeface!)
>Sii, did you know that the original name of the chap in your avatar is Snusmumriken (Swedish ). I know him as Nuuskamuikkunen (Finnish), one of my favourite Moomin characters.
Yep, he's known as Snufkin in the English translation - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snufkin - Moomins came up here - http://typophile.com/node/38652 and I switched to the Snufkin avatar - will stick with him unless the Hawks make the playoffs.
Cheers, Si
This is another historic moment in the life of Comic Sans. It should definitely be documented on the Wikipedia page
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comic_Sans
Captured from web.archive.org on 13 Oct 2013. view this capture