Quick question, perhaps... Under what typographical circumstances would I wish to switch off kerning. I ask because on MS Word it defaults to kerning off (I know this can be changed) and it made me wonder why they’ve programmed it that way.
> Under what typographical circumstances would I wish to switch off kerning
Complete lack of typographical knowledge might be one. A situation faced by 90% (I expect) of Word users.
Seriously, programming code with fixed width characters is the only no-kerning application I can think of, and I suspect that fixed width characters are designed with no kerning table anyway.
>not changed due to document reflow issues
At Typecon I talked to a guy from Microsoft who works on Publisher and he said that was the reason. I argued that if it is on by default you can still turn it off if you want the old flow. He said more or less that Microsoft customers are too clueless to do this, even if there is a notice when the change is made. And I said: by that reasoning you’ll never change to what you acknowledge is a better way. And he replied “go to hell.” Ok, he didn’t actually say that, but that was the message I got.
If you wanted to simulate the appearance of un-kerned metal-era type.
Or capture the flavour of unkerned shareware fonts.
Or if you have a connected script font in InD, set to “optical kerning”.
Actually, there’s no way to “de-kern” a font in InDesign.
But you can do it in Quark, I believe, by using the kern edit table.
Captured from web.archive.org on 9 Nov 2007. view this capture