Ok, I'll try to retype what got lost the last time, so I will be short. It might sound harsh because of that, I don't mean it to be. :)

A - The weight is on the wrong leg, it should be on the right one.
B/D - Bowls are a bit too light compared to the stem.
F - If you lower the crossbar on the F, it will optically fill up the large negative space. Don't apply this to the E.
J - Looks a bit weird, lower part too light.
K - Weight reversed, upper arm should be the lightest, lower arm heaviest.
P - I would slightly increase the bowl. See B/D.
S - Place the weight more on the spine. Said spine is also too horizontal I think.
T - Might be a bit too wide.
V/W - Apex too far to the right. Shift the apex more to the left.
7 - Same as V/W, the stem is too 'straight', the bottom of it should be shifted more to the left.
8/9 - Are rolling over optically (both to the right).

As for the rolling, that is because the level of slant is not consistent throughout the design. Maybe it is, but optically it isn't. :)

The serifs don't match the serifs on Clarendon — they're not slabbed enough, and the brackets are too big. Also, Clarendon has greater thick/thin contrast, which I think is one of its defining characteristics. Take a look at Ziggurat for some cues. It's a slab serif with a nice italic, but without the brackets connecting the stems to the serifs like Clarendon has. You should try modulating the strokes a bit.

I think this can be a very interesting project, just hang in there. There's a lot of potential for a very interesting and useful typeface here.

I am definatly going to spend more time on the weight distribution of the strokes, and also look at increasing the contrast of the thick and thin strokes.

The font is on the backburner for the moment while I work on some other projects but I will be picking it up again in the next month or so. Once I have updated it I will post it again.

Ziggurat is fantastic! Thanks for the link

Thanks a lot Quincunx and BradB

Jonny