Please critique this typeface. It's a sans serif family with four members.
Thanks
Rodrigo
buenos. here's my two cents:
-the uc & lc "c" seem top heavy. same problem is there with the lc "e" as well. if you were to extend the bottom line this could be avoided.
-one thing i don't understand is why does the stem in lc "u" and "y" slope, and it doesn't exist on any other stems. i suggest that you put a slant on the top of the leg on the lc "k" and add a slant to the end of the hairline in the lc "x."
-the uc "W" just doesn't do it for me, same thing with the lc "w." the lc "w" looks like it's 2 v's put together. try to integrate them more. the uc "W" looks funny with the extended line in the middle.
-the stroke of the uc "M" and "N" seems too thick compared to the rest of your uc.
I love your letter forms. They're all very light and airy. It's going to look great with just a little bit of tweaking. I hope that my terminology was correct
t1mmy
Some improvements to my IndoSans.
(pdf file).
Please opinions, thanks.
indo01_02.pdf (200 k) |
Much better, in fact, pretty good increase in attention to detail (like in the numeral "8"). I think structurally you're almost finished, but there are still some issues of curve smoothness, alignment (like probably make the curved leg of the "n" go lower), the spacing (seems a bit irregular) and I think it should have a little bit more stroke contrast. Maybe. :-/
hhp
Hi typo guys!
After a year and more... More IndoSans!
04 Version.
Thanks for all the comments!
Indo04.pdf (82.6 k) |
Captured from commoncrawl.org on 19 Apr 2015. original URL