Typophile

Evolution of the Latin script

Nick Shinn

This is a theory I developed in 2003 while designing Preface, but I thought I’d introduce it here in relation to several Typophile threads which have discussed the relationship and variability of letterforms in the Latin-Greek-Cyrillic script triad.

I set out to introduce a selection of more recent letterforms into the Latin grotesque (19th century sans such as AG/Helvetica/Arial), and discovered that these forms came from non-print media, where the spacing is not as subtle. Typewriter, road signs, OCR, computer monitor, neon, and the Breuer chair.

It’s not a drastic change to the Latin script, which is so diverse anyway, but it’s notable that the use of serifed forms of I, i, j and l in sans faces for typewriter and www makes these forms extremely widespread.

With both Verdana and Comic Sans featuring a serifed “I”, that constitutes a 21st century default.

Griffith/Bell Gothic also has this letterform; although designed for print, again crude, not subtle typography.

**

Going back a little further, somewhat more fundamental changes to the Latin script:
1. Abolishing the long s, early 19th century.
2. Establishing the single-storey g as a legitimate and widespread upright form (previously it had been used only for italics and scripts). AG (1890s) and Futura (1920s) were instrumental.
3. Conversely, the use of tail-less “f”, an upright convention, in italics.

This gives me something else to consider as part of my thesis. I’ve decided to do a comparison of significant grotesques and use the results to help me design a new one. This week I’ll be layout out the commentary over the entire regular weight alphabets of ten faces, I’ll post it once I have it ready.

Nick,
I would also be interested to see how you view serif faces evolving through the same time period.
The linguistic changes (dropping long ess) are a different breed than what you show above. My guess would

Captured from web.archive.org on 20 Nov 2008. view this capture