Hi typophiles, this is our fist proyect as a team, in Chile. We start to think in how the
eye changes the perception of the forms in a typeface with far distance exposure, on highways.
Please help us with your feedback, thanks.
OPTICA
We dont have a referece in a book, and we dont talk with James Montabano yet. We are building the letters on empiric tests at this first step, comparing the problems who occur in common used typefaces, here in chile we found Interstate on highways,and Frutiger on small signages and information in buses(local transportation). In the internet we look at Clearview now,and we want to start to compare some of our proposals with the Clearview typeface.
1.- Clearview, 2.-Optica
Hern
Very interesting the use of irregularity on a sans serif typeface to increase its legibility. I like this idea.
Do you have some bibliographic reference about this topic?
The irregularity helps to transform letter in words. Letters work better together than isolated.
Maybe it is also a good idea for a sanserif typeface for text.
Another question: which will be the colour of the letter and of the panel?
I printed the pdf and looked the paper from far (I have sight handicap and I could be a good tester..). It works very well, but I fear that the eye of "e" and of "a" is a little bit small.
In my opinion the capital "E" is too much condensed.
I just stumbled across this thread.
Your comparisons and samples of halation look like they are computer generated. This is of no use whatsoever. The optics of halation are quite a complex phenomenon. The only way to truely get an idea of what is going on is to make signs on the appropriate retro-reflective material and document what happens through a carefully controlled experiment.
Different retro-reflective materials from different manufacturers (ie Diamond Grade, Prismatic) will create different halation issues.
Another thing to keep in mind when dealing with these sorts of fonts is their acceptability to the general highway engineering community. One of the reasons Clearview looks the way it does was it was designed to solve problems of legibility and readability without scaring the very conservative highway engineers with a radical "designed" solution.
It seems to me most signage type in Italy follow quite raw and simplicistic rules.
I've had no actual problem in reading it, but this does not meen it can't be improved.
Does anyone of you (from Italy) know who designed most of the types we found in our cities (and highways). I'm sure there's more than two alphabets around, even considering the condensed ones.
I don't know who is the designer, sorry. I remember some year ago Manuela Rattin told me something about this topic, but I can't remember.
About italian signs, it's almost impossible for me to drive in an unknown place, as I can't read the road signs at all...
: )
The all caps condensed bold is a big problem for me. There is too few *white* (green, blue) inside and between the letters, I suppose.
Nice work, Miguel. Let me see if I get your meaning on the vertical
stroke structure: the middle sections of the glyphs generally
suffer from more halo-ing, so the solution was to make that
portion of the vertical stroke thinner?
I predict a Montalbano swoop on this thread within a couple days.
The sooner the better.
Captured from web.archive.org on 12 Oct 2013. view this capture