Here’s a new bitmap display face I’m working on. Tucson comes in 2 styles: Tucson Lanky and Tucson Squat. Perfect for a techno-cowboy website. 
You’re too clever for words, Hrant. As hip as Dave is,
I bet the Tuscon connection didn’t cross his mind.
Mr. Chau — I’m in love with Tuscon Squot. Nice work.
The ‘Q’ does create some problems when it touches
the following glyph.
Out of curiosity, are you in cahoots with Miguel H.?
Back in April he mentioned something about doing
a set of western pixel fonts.
If you’re not in cahoots, you should get so. Your
individual streams of bitmap talent call for a confluence.
Ooops. Yep. Looks like we have another comment
for Fignuts Condensed Light.
>Oh, and I enjoyed the Tucson/Tuscan play on words (even if it was unintentional).
it wasn’t unintentional. it is a tuscan face, so ‘tucson’ seemed to be an obvious (albeit slightly corny) choice for a name.
>Ah! A legibility issue. That’s an “a”, Stephen. See the pixel now?
word. i’m still tweaking fignuts, and you guys just spotted another detail for me to fix. thanks.
I’d agree with Martin. Try this as vector. Another thing you might try…how would an alternate face look if you filled in the negative ‘crab claw’ space? Made it a slab, basically. Maybe just on the bottom?
If anyone hasn’t checked out www.saywerd.com, go now. It’s offbeat fun.
bj
? filter test: fuçk, fück ?
> The ‘Q’ does create some problems when it touches the following glyph.
I created the ‘Q’ to fit perfectly snug with the ‘U.’ I figured it was worth the risk of it running into the ‘R’ or any other letter because, well, I speak and write english, and that usually doesn’t happen anyway. 
> …though I’m concerned the difference in stem bulk wouldn’t make it work so well.
I tried it, and I agree. This is simply how I conceived the emphasis working out when I designed it: 
>
> I created the ‘Q’ to fit perfectly snug with the ‘U.’ I figured ….
Good design is exactly this type of thinking.
» …though I’m concerned the difference in stem bulk wouldn’t make it work so well.
> I tried it, and I agree.
I don’t get it — can I see a sample?
They way you have it now isn’t that useful; the heights have to be equalized.
hhp
> I don’t get it — can I see a sample?
here’s a sample to get an idea of what it would look like: 
> how would an alternate face look if you filled in the negative ‘crab claw’ space? Made it a slab, basically.
I tried it and came up with another variation on the face. The new slab-serif font is called Bylas (named after a town in Arizona, about 80 miles from Tucson). Here’s a comparison: 
Dave — for want of a better phrase — it’s all good. Keep developing this idea. Do think about the origins of such fonts though; they were fonts for posters and were rarely used at sizes less than, say, 72 point. If you can make bitmap versions with flavor then go for it, but the richness of these design ideas you have really should be manifested in vector fonts.
Captured from web.archive.org on 9 Nov 2017. view this capture