Ellen Lupton is one I can think of. Anyone else got any ideas on who specifically I should look at for inspiration? Thank you.
"concrete poetry" might be a good example of what you are looking for as well:
http://www.rediscov.com/sacknerarchives/browsecollections.aspx
I guess Apollinaire's "Il Pleut" had words “crashing letter by letter down the page and onto the end of the page”. 3 versions at:
http://perso.univ-lyon2.fr/~edbreuil/litterature/Apollinaire/La-pluie/pl...
and Stéphane Mallarmé’s "Un coup de Dés" does something similar:
http://www.math.dartmouth.edu/~doyle/docs/coup/scan/coup.pdf
also check out "Early Visual Poetry 1506-1726" at:
http://www.ubu.com/historical
Filippo Marinetti’s “freed words”
http://colophon.com/gallery/futurism/7.html
and Massin’s layout for Ionesco’s "la Cantatrice Chauve"
http://paris.blog.lemonde.fr/?name=2006_03_massin_la_canta
Sup Ben, In the Essay I link to, it mentions that, depending on how you define an experiment, all typography is an experiment, and 'to experiment' is a "part" of the design process. Giggly mentioned Lupton, so her thoughts might have been with the whole cranbrook in-crowd. I was pointing out about the definition of the word, and more that the peps should/could go and read an interesting essay and learn for themselves too! (as the essay also mentions that it can be up to individual desgners interpretations). Semantics!
I like how Tiff through Paul Rand in, and Dezcom hit us with Max Bill, thats the shizza.
Nothing's up Duncan. The majority of Peter Bilak's essay that you refer to is about experimental type design. Miss G's question is about experimental typographic layout.
If you have deduced the idea that 'all typography is an experiment' from Hamish Muir's quote then I think you should re-read the essay; it is used in the text as an illustration of diversity of opinion – it is really not the main thrust of the essay – and it is immediately balanced by a counter statement from Melle Hammer (which I think is probably nearer the truth).
Semantics!? How about the difference between 'through' and 'threw'?
Hey,
Nothing’s up Duncan.
ouch.
The majority of Peter Bilak’s essay that you refer to is about experimental type design
no its not.
If you have deduced,
I didn't deduce anything, just pointed out about defining the word experiment.
it is used in the text as an illustration of diversity of opinion
yup.
and it is immediately balanced by a counter statement from Melle Hammer (which I think is probably nearer the truth).
good, an opinion.
How about the difference between ‘through’ and ‘threw’?
yup you got me :_(
Peace.
yes, I guess Hermann Zapf have to be in your list, look at his Manuale Typographicum published in 1957... http://www.typogabor.com/manuale-hermann-zapf/ there is pure experimental typography...
and Bradbury Thompson for Westvaco inspirations:
http://paris.blog.lemonde.fr/2007/07/26/westvaco-ii-la-periode-1953-a-19...
and Herbert Lubalin and Neville Brody, that's obvious doctor Watson : http://www.typogabor.com/herb-lubalin/
http://www.typogabor.com/neville-brody/
Captured from web.archive.org on 26 Dec 2010. view this capture