Typophile

Dairy Farm Logo Critique

wvbeek

Hey, I'm a complete newbie to typophile, so bear with me.
I have completed a design education recently
(not graphic, but industrial, so I'm not going to claim that I am a graphic designer)

anyways, my family has a dairy farm, and thus as typical, a sign stands at the end of the lane with the farm name etc.

the sign was old, needing a repaint (at the bare minimum)i of course volunteered to give it something of a freshen up

posted first is the sign before hand (very typical or cliché for the scenario)

so i felt like giving it a change, giving the farm something of a brand identity kinda thing,

i searched the net for some inspiration, and posted is a pic for a horse farm that i kinda used as the basis for the design
thus comes the design i came up with and the after picture of the sign

please critique or comment as you see fit

thanks

AttachmentSize
before.jpg18.16 KB
horse logo.jpg11.97 KB
sign-logo.jpg24.57 KB
after.jpg122.87 KB

ok, adding to this, the graphic that i made up, based on pictures of 'show cows', where part of the ideal is to have the straight as a ruler back or 'top-line', so just a bit on the reasoning of the graphic

something of a small farm magazine publication was also made, where my parents asked me to produce an advert for the farm, to be based on the sign, thus the 'branding' begins, the idea of farm business cards has also been tossed around

anyways,
2 groups of images, in the first group, the third one is what we went with, the second group of images is what i did later

again, comments welcome, feedback is always useful

reasoning for the use of orange is because of the dutch family name/heritage, just a quick point on that

Alright, I know that this was a string of posts, back to back, but this is the end of the story, or where things stand currently.

A few months ago, in an instance of local mailbox bashings, the sign was also destroyed (plywood construction defeated with drunken force and golf clubs).

Anyways, so now the sign frame stands empty, and my family wanting a new sign. Of course it would be nice to make something a little bit more vandalism proof. Anyways, I see this as an opportunity for a complete revamp on the sign, change up the framing/format and everything, meaning that the orientation and layout of the whole kinda graphic could change.

So this is where I would really appreciate feedback on what I have posted thus far, in terms of orientation/layout for how you feel that this might be successful.

-go feedback!!-

thanks

In terms of production don't have bleeds on both the top and the bottom. You push the cost of printing up, that is if you are going to print.

I would review your design based on what the industry is doing. Your design is light and airy like a boutique selling clothing but is that the image you want to present to your target audience. Do they want arty design or bold, productive, safe qualities. Its not a bad design but maybe not the right one for your industry.

Thanks for the input Dan, I can see what you mean on the font. (I assume you meant the font was "light and airy like a boutique..."

(hopefully the graphic was good)

anyways, so thinking about the target audience, its not the finished product (milk) we are selling, its really more of the farm image kinda thing, (versus other farms), with animal genetics and pedigree being part of the image, the past year, we had many farm tours in to look at a few animals that were drawing attention, (bus tours, people from Australia, Germany, Denmark, U.S., as well as some from other regions of Canada.

Perusing the web, I found this pic/graphic that I thought to be kinda nice, maybe a bit of a point of inspiration.

Also, some examples of other farm signs I found on the net

ok, taking Dan's comments into consideration
(taking them as focusing on the font),
I've played around with all the different fonts I've got/downloaded
(hurrah www.dafont.com)

anyways, here are some of the alternative looks

please, as always, feel free to comment, tell me what you think works/doesn't, what might suit the situation/audience etc.

thanks

You're doing well to look into bolder faces, as it would improve readability, I think. Why not hand-draw the name in a very clear legible script?

You need to beef up (haha, get it...'beef'...ah, nevermind...) the weight of the type a bit, IMHO. As such you might want to try making th strokes of the cow a bit bolder too.

Dear god, please don't use Trajan or Marcelle. Some of the scripts are looking good with the cow (particularly Heather, for me) but I agree, beef up whatever you use. Make sure to check your kerning with the cap W and H for the final.

Some roman ideas, going off Koch Antiqua (which I think Lillith is ripped off of).

William, from the top of the head to the the tip of the tail, the line weight never changes. I'd suggest getting more line weight variances to add flow and break up that "stiff" back. This will help relate it better to your choice of script fonts.

You're welcome to use my Typophile logo you see at the left of this post!!!!!
DB~

If we're showing off our own cow logos now, here the one I've done:

http://www.herd-pro.com/assets/topbanner/topbanner_left.gif

You have to love cows.

Trajan is far from the right type, but that particular setup, with the tight leading bringing the word "Holsteins" off of the cow's back, helps with the balance. Right now the composition is far too heavy on the right. In other words, if you set this logo down on the ground, everything would tip over and fall back on the cow's hindquarters. Perhaps if the apex/fulcrum of the tail curled up rather than dow, or if the type set in some way to bring physical weight back over to the left.

Hey, thanks everyone for the feedback so far.
In terms of the 'layout', well, the placement of the text and everything of course in these samples isn't really considered too much, at this stage I was still really playing around trying to find the font that worked best, and as per the logo critiques, I'm going to try tweaking it a bit.

aluminum-
I agree completely!
As Will Rogers' obscure brother Vinnie said,
"I never met a cow I didn't like."
DB~

And of course, as for type choices, you have to at least consider this one:

http://fonthead.com/font-sampler.php?l=1&font=holstein

My only suggestion is to maybe "beef" it up a little (damn, I'm to clever :P)

It looks pretty thin at such a large size, I think it could be a little thicker, especially if it's going on a sign.

Hi again, it's been a while since I posted, was busy with things, so not a whole lot of progress since the last feedback.
Just a refresher, what the sign used to look like:

What the newer sign looked like (past tense as it was destroyed by vandalism):

So, since the old one was destroyed, we are going to have the new one done with vinyl cut letters on a white acrylic board, hopefully helping it last longer and not having to worry about repainting.
Also, since, the farm no longer has exclusively Holstein cows, but now Brown Swiss too, so I have been told that the sign should only read the farm name: Wellsfarm

This reduction from “Wellsfarm Holsteins” to “Wellsfarm” has left me not sure how I feel about the balance of the look, so help and ideas are welcome.
Also, since the sign is going to be done on a white acrylic board, I think colour matching to the frame and posts might be difficult, so I’m thinking that they would be better in black, and would help to punch the sign out better.
Thoughts???


Based on earlier critiques, I have ‘beefed’ ah ha ha… up the logo a bit, and my preference of fonts has lead me to go with “Lilith Regular” (from daFont), which someone said is a ripoff of Koch Antiqua.

I realize that those images are a bit on the small side to evaluate the type/logo part, here is the main focus:

I find the back of the cow too long and too straight, and looks more like the rear of a car.
Is this intentional?

The back of the cow this way IS intentional, within the dairy industry, where cow "type" is pushed, a level (like a ruler) back is pushed as ideal, regardless of how unrealistic this might seem. I did use a picture of a 'show cow' for guidelines when doing the logo, I think I actually used a picture for an underlay to get it going. I believe that I might have actually shortened the back to make it fit better with the sign.
http://www.comestar.qc.ca/lautamie.html
This link shows an example of what you see typically in photographed show cows. So there you can see, flat back, and long proportions lend to the 'Dairy' character of the cow.

You need to kern the We and fa tighter and sf looser, I would also move the image to the left to centre it better; the weight of the line for the tail seems a bit heavy and exaggerated compared to the detail in the head. I am not convinced that the typeface is the best choice for signage, the x-height is extremely low.

Tim

You could fix your kerning problems by buying a licence for a real version of Koch Antiqua instead of using a rip-off version, although I agree with Tim that it's not a good face for signage.

- Lex

Now who would go and vandalize a family Dairy Farm's sign? Sad.

I have to agree with the others...the type and the illustration are way to thin for signage applications. If the sign needs to be functional (ie, easily read from the road) then consider using a beefier face.

Who would vandalize a family Dairy Farm's sign, well, people who were mad when they didn't manage to bash in the metal mailbox.

Anyways, since no-one seems to be a fan of the font there, (and I am growing less fond of it), time for some new ones.
I think I've pretty much decided that a nice simple serif font would suit the application the best, in my mind at least. Gives the look of something well established I think.
Anyways, here are some ideas (no names just lettered), and I know that they are not perfectly aligned right now, I am still trying to figure out what font suits best.









Another thing I was considering with layout, is blowing up the image a bit bigger, and shrinking the text down and dropping it in the image.
(This is also one of the fonts that I was liking more)


Any further thoughts or ideas are always welcome.

I like the placement inside the cow - it makes the logo seem more unified. Although I'd go with a heavier font and give the text just a touch more breathing room.

- Lex

Alright, on that last note then, 4 versions with the text inside, I do kind of like that myself, it does tie together a bit more I think, but on the other hand, I'm also afraid the text is getting lost.


With these ones, I do like how the W in 1, 3, and 4 seem to match well with the lower stroke on the cows neck.

IMHO, consider #4 with all small-caps (don't uppercase the first letter). Then tweak the hell out of the kerning.

I love number 4! Yes, try it with all small-caps.

With the text inside of the cow, it would make for a cool cutout sign.

Very nice!

OK, thanks for the last bit.
This is where I am at now.
Overall, I think it's fairly good, but I do find it to be kinda empty looking.
Anyone have any thoughts on that?

Maybe try giving the cow some facial features to make it seem less empty?

Maybe add a sun to the top corner of the diamond? Grass to the bottom?

I don't think the logo is empty, but rather it's crammed into an akqard shape.

If anything, maybe just shrink the logo by 20% so it has some breathing room within the diamond.

Do you have to keep it in a diamond?

I don't think it's too empty at all - but rather beautifully simple.

I would move the type to the left, it is rather cramped by the tail. My opinion is that the uppercase is very difficult to kern satisfactorily with the WE, LLS and ARM and that an upper and lower version might be better.

Tim

I agree, you still have lots of room to work with on the left. I think once you have it kerned properly, it'll look gorgeous. Very charming. And way ahead of the industry compared to all the competitor's farms you displayed. Why don't you add a simple little eyelid to combat that "emptiness" you feel. Maybe something like this:

Now scroll up. The cow with no eye is almost scary now. Poor cow!

Captured from web.archive.org on 20 Oct 2013. view this capture