Dear Type Experts,
Does anyone know if it’s proper to use “double-dash” looks like this: -- I've never heard of it!
Is it “legal” to use? I always use en dash OR em dash.
I’m scratching my head :(
Or are you talking about online? As in the first paragraph of this article I was just reading. Because I think people use "--" when they don't know the HTML for an en (&ndash) or em (&mdash) dash?
Oh, and just to let you know, this question should have been posted in the General Discussions forum, not the Type ID or Crit ones.
> the HTML for an en (&ndash) or em (&mdash) dash
Just a point for reference. Both the entities mentioned above need a semicolon at the end. An entity without the semicolon works in IE, and perhaps in other browsers, but is incorrect and may not work correctly in all cases. An entity is defined as starting with the ampersand and ending with a semicolon.
To be fair, the em and en dashes are typographic luxuries, and not everybody is aware that they have more characters available to them than what is immediately aparrent on the keyboard. A double hyphen is acceptable when all you have is a typewriter, and somewhat forgivable when using a monospace font as one often does for email, but an em dash should be substituted when it becomes available.
For more on proper dash usage, see this discussion:
http://typophile.com/node/30372
If you were on an old-fashion typewriter (manual or electric) and you needed to type a 1-M dash for your manuscript -- you did not have an M-dash to use. So it became common practice for the typist to use two hyphens to show the extreme pause.
However, when this same document made it the "professional" typeshop, it was automatically changed to the 1-M dash it was meant to be.
Hope that clears things up a bit.
Also, don't forget one line under a word or sentence was for emphasis - the typewriter could do that fine...but they didn't have the italic counterpart that the "professional" used.
There are lots of instances from typewriter to typesetting we can go through just like this.
Captured from web.archive.org on 22 Oct 2014. view this capture