thanks for the link! I was thrown by the site design at first. whether it's in-progress or intentionally old-school in it's approach, it works very well as is.

the type is quite nice. the low-tech revivals are done with a lot of personal style (the site design makes infinitely more sense once you see their fonts). I'm not quite sure about their *text* label. I suppose text might be acceptable nomenclature in web terms, but I'm not going to be using them anytime soon for any of my upcoming book jobs!

It's intentional. I like it, too.