Surely this is only a hastily prepared facsimile of Bob Woodward's new book cover (gif from Barnes & Noble). If the actual cover is this bad....

This isn't a type crime–it's just par for course in Washington. This town is full of ugly dust jackets that would make a designer weep, because the publishers know that these books only sell to policy wonks and political junkies who really couldn't care less about the jackets anyway. Bob Woodward certainly deserves better, but for yet another political book in the endless stream that the current political climate engenders, it's really not all that bad.
James,
There is a far broader market than our DC beltway Blackberry addicts for that kind of book and the publisher knows it is not a point-of-purchase sale issue. It will sell purely on title and author. The publisher probably thinks this might be the next "All the Presidents Men" best seller. Therefore, no need to throw money away on a cover design worthy of print. It is just a cheap way out and they don't care about the small number of type-savvy readers who probably would never buy it anyway.
ChrisL
Schlock in schlock out. To me the galling thing is that people who ought to know better, look the other way, this is not just in books, but in a lot of printed material. The fact that more people buy and use type than any other time does not mean any more are doing it better than earlier periods. To me there will always be a highend market that will use type amazingly well, but then there is now a separation where there used to be a middle ground of designers who used type well enough, if not a little dull. It used to be easy, they looked at the galley of type and then they either politely called or screamed for changes to their liking. When the responsibilty changed to them doing the grunt work, well the common thinking seems to be "good enough from my house." This is where we are at and why book covers like this look like, well, schlock.
The Truth shall set you free
Chris: Put enough alcohol into me and I could not only do book design that poorly but forget how to punctuate too. :-P
Rodrigue: You make a good point, and one that I'm sure many of us have raised with our clients (and in some cases, former clients!).
For example, our local transit authority has an on-going campaign about what is kewl on the system (i.e., don't crowd doorways, use earphones for your iPod, etc.) -- one of the posters deals with "Appropriate Behavior." However, they have used the word "behaviour" three times in it -- once spelled with the "u", the other two without.
Now given that the City standard is British spelling (we are in Canada, after all), and the illustration has "City Center" in it (and the signage on the train platforms is "City Centre"), one has to wonder who designed this project and who approved it up the line.
I emailed them a note about this just before Christmas last year, and while I notice there are a few new ones up with proper (and consistent) spellings, you still see a lot of the "wrong" ones around.
Every time I see one, I want to have a "Billy Jack" moment.....
Linda
Captured from web.archive.org on 13 Jul 2014. view this capture