There is something about the relationship between the two words – Stefan is not quite short enough to match the x-height of architekt (I should say this image size makes it difficult to be sure). I would also say the FA of Stefan and the hi of architekt need to be kerned slightly tighter. The squares don't sit comfortably with the type, perhaps if the top of the bottom square was flush with the x-height/cap height and moved slightly to the left. Again this is affected by screen/image size but the lowercase seems to have quite a rambling baseline, where the rounded characters overshoot and the dot of the i seems too prominent.
When reversed out is it your intention to use that rectangular shape or is that just an example?
Tim
hi guys!
I'm currently in the process of designing a logo for a local architect who's got about 20 years of experience but finally decided to start his own bureau.
His area of activity reaches from building small hospitals to large casinos and it's currently a one-man business but he's NOT aiming to become a 50 people agency anyway..
He wanted his logo to be mainly typography which should be clean, corporate looking and shouldn't be embarrassing. The only shape or form I'm allowed to use is a square due to his vision of a square being the ultimate form, undistorted and straightforward.
the concept I came up with can be seen here

STEFAN is placed in capitals to distuingish itself from "architect" and to make clear that the architect is called stefan...
the squares between the text are pretty small so that the don't stand out too much and they're seperated into 3 pieces to give the impression of something being built..
they also form an arrow pointing upwards to intensify the impression of something going on..
what do you think so far?
any c&c appreciated
cheers mike
