I'm looking for a narrow serif typface. It's going to be used for an one page essay (about politics), and I want to fit a lot of text on the same page. It should of course be legible...
It might seem counter-intuitive, but narrowness actually results in less economy than a wide face!
(Except in one-line settings.)
The reasons are that:
1) A wide face can be used at a smaller point size while maintaining (and possibly even improving* on) apparent size.
2) Linebreaks in text will often negate the culmulative horizontal savings a narrow face accumulates over many lines. A wider face at a smaller point size always saves in vertical space.
* This I still have to verify.
So a narrow face will only be more economical than a wide face -at a smaller size- if your text has very few linebreaks.
However, wide faces can convey less elegance/sophistication than a narrow face (like see the new LA Times body face), so a good reason to use a narrow font to save space would be if you want to convey a certain atmosphere. And note that a good narrowness/width depends on the point size (more like point size range) you're using.
Anyway, if you do decide on a narrow font, try Stone Print.
hhp
I just thought of a potential loophole in your teacher's "rule".
If you could just get him to drop the 2-point leading requirement (try to think of a good excuse for that, like short lines), what you could do is use a font that's wide but small on the body, with zero (or maybe even negative) leading. That way you'll have a "12 point" font ("Just look, Quark says it's 12 point!"), but you could use width/size instead of narrowness to save space.
hhp
Captured from commoncrawl.org on 27 Apr 2015. original URL