This is going to seem like a really ridiculous question but I have a friend who insists that when he outlines fonts in Illustrator, they become stroked paths, not outlines. Is this actually possible?
peace
If I remember correctly, Type 3 allowed practically any PostScript function to be used, including strokes, grayscale, conditional statements—anything pretty much. This is how random fonts like Beowolf were possible. It was also used for clip art fonts with complex images. The downside: no hints, so if all you wanted to do was to make a normal font, it looked like crap on a 300 dpi laser printer.
I do recall a company selling Type 3 fonts based on strokes. The advantage they touted was that you could squeeze or stretch the fonts without the kind of distortions you would get with outline fonts. Unfortunately, since the fonts were composed of unvarying strokes, the designs were limited and lacked optical corrections.
I also seem to recall that the original version of Courier that was built into the original LaserWriter was stroke-based.
If I can add a small comment.
Type 1 fonts permit stroke-based outlines. Most of
the type 1 fonts have a PaintType defined to be 0,
but if you set it to be 1, and define StrokeWidth to be
the pen thickness (30 is thin, 100 is thick), then
outlines are stroked. This can be used to thicken
fonts (not recommended though!), but it can also be used
to render fonts as strokes only.
The change in the PaintType value and the addition of StrokeWidth
parameter can be done in a standard text editor on the “pfa” version
of a type 1 font.
If this sounds too technical, I apologize. I will try
better next time.
Luc
Thanks for the info guys. I was unimagineable for me what my friend was telling me. He told me he had to outline the strokes of the font, which was simply a unclosed path when looked at in Illustrator outline view.
Now instead of thinkng he’s crazy (or being jealous of his enhanced perception), I feel sorry for him that he had to deal with it. Fonts from the Stoned Age…
peace
Captured from web.archive.org on 26 May 2006. view this capture