attached is fairly standard stuff, but still interested in feedback.
The PDF is the latest one with current state as of 11th march
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| march11gem.pdf | 29.12 KB |
attached is fairly standard stuff, but still interested in feedback.
The PDF is the latest one with current state as of 11th march
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| march11gem.pdf | 29.12 KB |
Very very very nice! I'm not entirely sure about the crossbar on the t, as it looks like it clashes with the serif on the v next door. Perhaps f and g are similar. Which reminds me, where's the lowercase u?
But a gorgeous, highly legible font. I'm particularly fond of the jenson-y e and the tail on your a.
--Jim K.
some things on first sight:
a: has a hangover to the left (top is a tad too long?)
d: bottom right slightly too short/small. is the same part of "a" bigger?
g: great :)
h, m, n: serifs too long? somehow they look strange
t: bar seems to be ok, i think it's a positioning problem between t/v
z: slightly too heavy? Stroke-weight too indifferent?
O: seems to be a bit goofy in the bottom part (moved slightly too much to the right side?)
But overall, this looks very promising.
Captured from commoncrawl.org on 26 Apr 2015. original URL