hi all, working at the attached logo for a flyer distribution company. can't say i'm happy with it right now. one thing
is the spacing in "flyer"... what do you think? thanks: lars
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| f2g.gif | 10.78 KB |
hi all, working at the attached logo for a flyer distribution company. can't say i'm happy with it right now. one thing
is the spacing in "flyer"... what do you think? thanks: lars
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| f2g.gif | 10.78 KB |
the company distributes flyers to "display" at bars, shops and also clubs, but it's for an "overall" audience (not party orientated). well my mothers tongue aint english, would you say "flyers2go" instead of "flyer2go"? the idea behind the name is that you have that displays in a bar, restaurant or so and take that flyers if you like one (same like gocard, but for "regular" flyer distribution not just free postcard style flyers). thanks: lars
it somehow doesn't read nicely, it feels more like to seperate entities. the 2 doesn't seem to connect naturally to the GO. it might be because of the capitals in GO - have you tried lower case letters?
i'm also not sure about whether the individual elements really add up to a logo. maybe putting the entire type onto the cards would help giving it a stronger overall shape / contour.
overall it's a good starting point, but it's not good enough for the viewer to feel that it "absolutely has to be that way, no alternative." (know what i mean?)
Captured from web.archive.org on 16 Apr 2015. view this capture