Typophile

node 1691

unknown

>> having a full-fledged off-topic forum on Typophile is not a good idea.
-- hhp, from the Definition of Terrorism thread.

I think it remains to be seen whether the non-typographic
thread is useful or not, whether it'll turn out good, bad or
ugly. Formalized venting is one way to describe it, but not
the only way.

It hasn't really been tested.

Of course it seems like a useful place to share an off-topic
link, a news item, lawyer jokes, Bengal Tiger sightings, etc.
This stuff is getting tossed into General Discussions.
This is just a more specific place to toss it.

Focus, that's your mantra Hrant, if i'm not mistaken.

Does organizing a library by subject compartmentalize discourse?...

Why not just have one big general thread
and call it Stuff about Letters; that'll contribute to
making us all rounded people I suppose.

The thread also serves as a spillover area when things veer
off topic and turn ugly. Who wants Hrant v. William
name-calling in their InBox? I know I know, we haven't
seen ugly.

To say that the existence and usage of a little thread in an
online forum makes us less-rounded people?... autobrainwashing?...c'mon.

bj

unknown

I think this non-typographic bin will prove useful as a place to redirect discussions from other threads that go off-topic. This happens, and it is better for the off-topic discussion to be moved here than for the original thread to die because it gets taken over by off-topic posts.

unknown

If the non typographic general discussion forum is kept, it should be a full forum and not a sub forum, just for ease of use.

Captured from web.archive.org on 18 May 2005. view this capture